Re: Minimum failure domain

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hello,

On Thu, 15 Oct 2015 16:55:18 -0400 J David wrote:

> In the Ceph docs, at:
> 
> http://docs.ceph.com/docs/master/rados/deployment/ceph-deploy-osd/
> 
> It says (under "Prepare OSDs"):
> 
> "Note: When running multiple Ceph OSD daemons on a single node, and
> sharing a partioned journal with each OSD daemon, you should consider
> the entire node the minimum failure domain for CRUSH purposes, because
> if the SSD drive fails, all of the Ceph OSD daemons that journal to it
> will fail too."
> 
> This, of course, makes perfect sense.  But, it got me wondering...
> under what circumstances would one *not* consider a single node to be
> the minimum failure domain for CRUSH purposes?
>
When you have a test cluster consisting just of node basically.

Of course you would rather set the replication size to 1 in such a case
and be done. ^o^

Christian
-- 
Christian Balzer        Network/Systems Engineer                
chibi@xxxxxxx   	Global OnLine Japan/Fusion Communications
http://www.gol.com/
_______________________________________________
ceph-users mailing list
ceph-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com



[Index of Archives]     [Information on CEPH]     [Linux Filesystem Development]     [Ceph Development]     [Ceph Large]     [Linux USB Development]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [xfs]


  Powered by Linux