Hi Robert usable bytes so before replication. The size of the actual original objects you write. Cheers JC > On 15 Oct 2015, at 16:33, Robert LeBlanc <robert@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA256 > > One more question. Is max_{bytes,objects} before or after replication factor? > - ---------------- > Robert LeBlanc > PGP Fingerprint 79A2 9CA4 6CC4 45DD A904 C70E E654 3BB2 FA62 B9F1 > > > On Thu, Oct 15, 2015 at 4:42 PM, LOPEZ Jean-Charles wrote: >> Hi Robert, >> >> yes they do. >> >> Pools don’t have a size when you create them hence the couple value/ratio that is to be defined for cache tiering mechanism. Pool only have a number of PGs assigned. So setting the max values and the ratios for dirty and full must be set explicitly to match your configuration. >> >> Note that you can at the same time define max_bytes and max_objects. The first of the 2 values that breaches using your ratio settings will trigger eviction and/or flushing. The ratios you choose apply to both values. >> >> Cheers >> JC >> >>> On 15 Oct 2015, at 15:02, Robert LeBlanc wrote: >>> >>> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- >>> Hash: SHA256 >>> >>> hmmm... >>> >>> http://docs.ceph.com/docs/master/rados/operations/cache-tiering/#relative-sizing >>> >>> makes it sound like it should be based on the size of the pool and >>> that you don't have to set anything like max bytes/objects. Can you >>> confirm that cache_target_{dirty,dirty_high,full}_ratio works as a >>> ratio of target_max_bytes set? >>> - ---------------- >>> Robert LeBlanc >>> PGP Fingerprint 79A2 9CA4 6CC4 45DD A904 C70E E654 3BB2 FA62 B9F1 >>> >>> >>> On Thu, Oct 15, 2015 at 3:32 PM, Nick Fisk wrote: >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>>> -----Original Message----- >>>>> From: ceph-users [mailto:ceph-users-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of >>>>> Robert LeBlanc >>>>> Sent: 15 October 2015 22:06 >>>>> To: ceph-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx >>>>> Subject: Cache Tiering Question >>>>> >>>>> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- >>>>> Hash: SHA256 >>>>> >>>>> ceph df (ceph version 0.94.3-252-g629b631 >>>>> (629b631488f044150422371ac77dfc005f3de1bc)) is showing some odd >>>>> results: >>>>> >>>>> root@nodez:~# ceph df >>>>> GLOBAL: >>>>> SIZE AVAIL RAW USED %RAW USED >>>>> 24518G 21670G 1602G 6.53 >>>>> POOLS: >>>>> NAME ID USED %USED MAX AVAIL OBJECTS >>>>> rbd 0 2723G 11.11 6380G 1115793 >>>>> ssd-pool 2 0 0 732G 1 >>>>> >>>>> The rbd pool is showing 11.11% used, but if you calculate the numbers >>>> there >>>>> it is 2723/6380=42.68%. >>>> >>>> I have a feeling that the percentage is based on the amount used of the >>>> total cluster size. Ie 2723/24518 >>>> >>>>> >>>>> Will this cause problems with the relative cache tier settings? Do I need >>>> to set >>>>> the percentage based on what Ceph is reporting here? >>>> >>>> The flushing/eviction thresholds are based on the target_max_bytes number >>>> that you set, they have nothing to do with the underlying pool size. It's up >>>> to you to come up with a sane number for this variable. >>>> >>>>> >>>>> Thanks, >>>>> - ---------------- >>>>> Robert LeBlanc >>>>> PGP Fingerprint 79A2 9CA4 6CC4 45DD A904 C70E E654 3BB2 FA62 B9F1 ----- >>>>> BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- >>>>> Version: Mailvelope v1.2.0 >>>>> Comment: https://www.mailvelope.com >>>>> >>>>> wsFcBAEBCAAQBQJWIBVGCRDmVDuy+mK58QAAXEYQAKm5IBGn81Hlb9az4 >>>>> 52x >>>>> hSH6onk7mJE7L2s5FnoJv2sNW4azhDEVKGQBE9vvhIVBhhtKtnqdzu3ytk6E >>>>> EUFuPBzUWLJyG3wQtp3QC0PdYzlGkS7bowdpZqk9PdaYZYgEdqG/cLEl/eAx >>>>> LGIUXmr6vIuNhnntGIIYeUAiWXA7b5qzOKbef6OlOp7Mz6Euel9S8ycZlSAR >>>>> eBQ5hdLSFoFai5ldyV+/hmqLnujOfanRFC8pIYr41aKe7wBOPOargLGQdka3 >>>>> jswmcf+0hV7QqZSOjJijDYvOgRuHBFK6cdyP9SRKxWxG7uH+yDOvya0TqOob >>>>> 1yDomYC1zD2uzG9+L5Iv6at8fuBF5xFKPqax9N4WQj3Oj9fBwioQVBocNxHc >>>>> MIlQnvnLeq6OLtdfPoPignTAHIH2RrvAmdwYkSCuopjUSTkmBsyBLIiiz/KI >>>>> P4mSXAxZb0UF4pbCDgdYG6qUEywR/enGsT1lnmNLx4vY8W/yz9xQ3o3JnIpD >>>>> pWyo9zJ8Ugnwvihbo7xKe+EZOeJL0YF4BiyAprH5pKFdQcAWcV98zWHnLBxd >>>>> EFHyN9fHsVdw0UsxIUBZFfM1u4S7fchgVeFfiTSdGqd/dWHQCHKJPNBSJnae >>>>> aPKTyvg77N6zTn04VGspfenR+svGbkAtUfO2HJ1Kkd4/wZ9GIzsS1ovPZFsM >>>>> jJe4 >>>>> =YSyj >>>>> -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- >>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>> ceph-users mailing list >>>>> ceph-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx >>>>> http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>> >>> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- >>> Version: Mailvelope v1.2.0 >>> Comment: https://www.mailvelope.com >>> >>> wsFcBAEBCAAQBQJWICJwCRDmVDuy+mK58QAAyTUQALkwOnB++bXto+cM0iSZ >>> B3nZgvl9FKZnujb0MUIiS29a+Y2nnBpAGgHbF4Y9ngnDQYNZ0yf1DD2wYad2 >>> rll6pYeWRRYSmaBCBfdPlqbbVw8WpjdXLR9FtLFfUR2V+Ghf4U83F8iKiWn1 >>> +6DqouHMA/auHjEr49w+Ue0kpKSfItH/9LkVjYQBKp6E7tyOSsrzcM1milKR >>> lwsIOewiKvsg4neDLqkdqaO6+bYuaDJmgN+hEqzl7lxbzt5pJbzfknpiAewm >>> GTw8C2AUbzcYqIhzqWcY9Jiy6ZZkYAPDODsJpkc/Pubnq73jlkllB4JaQpJy >>> 2964DynNn8jBAI9JJpLyldtKPEofmkumzZ6tPXgLDuo2VuV+hp/wVadZKy2k >>> PDhms1dpeLFM8NsgOToSpO6Ej1l1857C5+cy3EeTlKqgs6z1QbTwNvUeeCpk >>> /ORObJQCa7teNEM1c33oEJ3V1LOx7SfsEn1A6PVaaUegmMEEa6Cb8Va2RYl8 >>> 5fhXqIcsU9KWHDmq8+MZ9x67etAucXKJmPQpIzJD6M9WtsWsDupsuJ1MgCKB >>> pxhqjwujuaZWfF+W3HEuOOP7OcXbj2U3RO1V3HOr9N0cLFTf+vuefIzOtgs1 >>> qdBPrxIUNznfYXarclFuJzCWPzKpDTdKbLwYUcbh9hKayRpll3DGOW7qUX3u >>> eNXR >>> =cI+5 >>> -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- >>> _______________________________________________ >>> ceph-users mailing list >>> ceph-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx >>> http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com >> > > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- > Version: Mailvelope v1.2.0 > Comment: https://www.mailvelope.com > > wsFcBAEBCAAQBQJWIDfDCRDmVDuy+mK58QAA8qkQAIBtEorNvkAwVojMmOcW > /zEGPw9Hg0OgvoR7gv4DWSKO4y8raek3oL7BNE5WNrpkRkpKfjGe6OLLtTr+ > 9b7K19Cv3oRQHVUG2S+rnwDzsg/4ORL90TZZSh729ThjE823g9PDpB1ThsdD > DApHvU4OoLEYVepCkxzZx4a8UztyaBnDl8/LCNK7Rzg30UWsiR9kRW4bru5F > igcFHslBmUSH0trbG0kxA9mrmnWq2m7i0QNVS1nUDJ7crDwqnJrnf17NG7NV > SQKKsAcuM2lmmAPkLIMy4J1oiBb8JXiCc27Bj+dtBG9Iqh8HdYvvmVd6O8Jv > bVgMUN7mmGGpuIs040Q3Fn4wSrhtGc5iUpzM5eJnemnrPi5ymE8WayHX6aak > qA5vfM8WLNKMmPBORqg2DB/1co6OkvHOLAk+ZAUYUo88I+dVp7BIXadaZMhS > GKbTPfpZgDdn0bHbn4Dyma1a1JVarpQXCaLq4ayvfY7DQuoFVi2eOImxvc+Q > gFSmmdegK0uto3aTnySR1fRl1Yk9grd+LSwJgmsew4t2AHjAbAYgG1idnvJt > t5e6Aj4NnNK3f085gkoundV1rrp37lu3Ot82gMq7xyxNmlT/FsAmOFSEelJP > U26AQHlgDM7oV95IQMnKOtdziIq7NFdspuVuN+umf7JpnuYLbROSREG3dIrq > qdxB > =de2k > -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- _______________________________________________ ceph-users mailing list ceph-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com