Hi Robert, yes they do. Pools don’t have a size when you create them hence the couple value/ratio that is to be defined for cache tiering mechanism. Pool only have a number of PGs assigned. So setting the max values and the ratios for dirty and full must be set explicitly to match your configuration. Note that you can at the same time define max_bytes and max_objects. The first of the 2 values that breaches using your ratio settings will trigger eviction and/or flushing. The ratios you choose apply to both values. Cheers JC > On 15 Oct 2015, at 15:02, Robert LeBlanc <robert@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA256 > > hmmm... > > http://docs.ceph.com/docs/master/rados/operations/cache-tiering/#relative-sizing > > makes it sound like it should be based on the size of the pool and > that you don't have to set anything like max bytes/objects. Can you > confirm that cache_target_{dirty,dirty_high,full}_ratio works as a > ratio of target_max_bytes set? > - ---------------- > Robert LeBlanc > PGP Fingerprint 79A2 9CA4 6CC4 45DD A904 C70E E654 3BB2 FA62 B9F1 > > > On Thu, Oct 15, 2015 at 3:32 PM, Nick Fisk wrote: >> >> >> >> >>> -----Original Message----- >>> From: ceph-users [mailto:ceph-users-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of >>> Robert LeBlanc >>> Sent: 15 October 2015 22:06 >>> To: ceph-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx >>> Subject: Cache Tiering Question >>> >>> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- >>> Hash: SHA256 >>> >>> ceph df (ceph version 0.94.3-252-g629b631 >>> (629b631488f044150422371ac77dfc005f3de1bc)) is showing some odd >>> results: >>> >>> root@nodez:~# ceph df >>> GLOBAL: >>> SIZE AVAIL RAW USED %RAW USED >>> 24518G 21670G 1602G 6.53 >>> POOLS: >>> NAME ID USED %USED MAX AVAIL OBJECTS >>> rbd 0 2723G 11.11 6380G 1115793 >>> ssd-pool 2 0 0 732G 1 >>> >>> The rbd pool is showing 11.11% used, but if you calculate the numbers >> there >>> it is 2723/6380=42.68%. >> >> I have a feeling that the percentage is based on the amount used of the >> total cluster size. Ie 2723/24518 >> >>> >>> Will this cause problems with the relative cache tier settings? Do I need >> to set >>> the percentage based on what Ceph is reporting here? >> >> The flushing/eviction thresholds are based on the target_max_bytes number >> that you set, they have nothing to do with the underlying pool size. It's up >> to you to come up with a sane number for this variable. >> >>> >>> Thanks, >>> - ---------------- >>> Robert LeBlanc >>> PGP Fingerprint 79A2 9CA4 6CC4 45DD A904 C70E E654 3BB2 FA62 B9F1 ----- >>> BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- >>> Version: Mailvelope v1.2.0 >>> Comment: https://www.mailvelope.com >>> >>> wsFcBAEBCAAQBQJWIBVGCRDmVDuy+mK58QAAXEYQAKm5IBGn81Hlb9az4 >>> 52x >>> hSH6onk7mJE7L2s5FnoJv2sNW4azhDEVKGQBE9vvhIVBhhtKtnqdzu3ytk6E >>> EUFuPBzUWLJyG3wQtp3QC0PdYzlGkS7bowdpZqk9PdaYZYgEdqG/cLEl/eAx >>> LGIUXmr6vIuNhnntGIIYeUAiWXA7b5qzOKbef6OlOp7Mz6Euel9S8ycZlSAR >>> eBQ5hdLSFoFai5ldyV+/hmqLnujOfanRFC8pIYr41aKe7wBOPOargLGQdka3 >>> jswmcf+0hV7QqZSOjJijDYvOgRuHBFK6cdyP9SRKxWxG7uH+yDOvya0TqOob >>> 1yDomYC1zD2uzG9+L5Iv6at8fuBF5xFKPqax9N4WQj3Oj9fBwioQVBocNxHc >>> MIlQnvnLeq6OLtdfPoPignTAHIH2RrvAmdwYkSCuopjUSTkmBsyBLIiiz/KI >>> P4mSXAxZb0UF4pbCDgdYG6qUEywR/enGsT1lnmNLx4vY8W/yz9xQ3o3JnIpD >>> pWyo9zJ8Ugnwvihbo7xKe+EZOeJL0YF4BiyAprH5pKFdQcAWcV98zWHnLBxd >>> EFHyN9fHsVdw0UsxIUBZFfM1u4S7fchgVeFfiTSdGqd/dWHQCHKJPNBSJnae >>> aPKTyvg77N6zTn04VGspfenR+svGbkAtUfO2HJ1Kkd4/wZ9GIzsS1ovPZFsM >>> jJe4 >>> =YSyj >>> -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- >>> _______________________________________________ >>> ceph-users mailing list >>> ceph-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx >>> http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com >> >> >> >> > > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- > Version: Mailvelope v1.2.0 > Comment: https://www.mailvelope.com > > wsFcBAEBCAAQBQJWICJwCRDmVDuy+mK58QAAyTUQALkwOnB++bXto+cM0iSZ > B3nZgvl9FKZnujb0MUIiS29a+Y2nnBpAGgHbF4Y9ngnDQYNZ0yf1DD2wYad2 > rll6pYeWRRYSmaBCBfdPlqbbVw8WpjdXLR9FtLFfUR2V+Ghf4U83F8iKiWn1 > +6DqouHMA/auHjEr49w+Ue0kpKSfItH/9LkVjYQBKp6E7tyOSsrzcM1milKR > lwsIOewiKvsg4neDLqkdqaO6+bYuaDJmgN+hEqzl7lxbzt5pJbzfknpiAewm > GTw8C2AUbzcYqIhzqWcY9Jiy6ZZkYAPDODsJpkc/Pubnq73jlkllB4JaQpJy > 2964DynNn8jBAI9JJpLyldtKPEofmkumzZ6tPXgLDuo2VuV+hp/wVadZKy2k > PDhms1dpeLFM8NsgOToSpO6Ej1l1857C5+cy3EeTlKqgs6z1QbTwNvUeeCpk > /ORObJQCa7teNEM1c33oEJ3V1LOx7SfsEn1A6PVaaUegmMEEa6Cb8Va2RYl8 > 5fhXqIcsU9KWHDmq8+MZ9x67etAucXKJmPQpIzJD6M9WtsWsDupsuJ1MgCKB > pxhqjwujuaZWfF+W3HEuOOP7OcXbj2U3RO1V3HOr9N0cLFTf+vuefIzOtgs1 > qdBPrxIUNznfYXarclFuJzCWPzKpDTdKbLwYUcbh9hKayRpll3DGOW7qUX3u > eNXR > =cI+5 > -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- > _______________________________________________ > ceph-users mailing list > ceph-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx > http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com _______________________________________________ ceph-users mailing list ceph-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com
 |