Hi, Kobi,
>> We are currently testing tuning civetweb's num_threads
>> and request_timeout_ms to improve radosgw performance
I wonder how's your testing of radosgw perofrmance going?
We hit some limitation of single radosgw instance, about ~300MB/s.
I'm just thinking how num_threads & request_timeout_ms affects rgw thoughput.
Cheers,
Po
On Fri, Sep 11, 2015 at 3:05 AM, <ceph-users-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Message: 9
Date: Wed, 9 Sep 2015 23:36:33 -0700
From: Kobi Laredo <kobi.laredo@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: Vickie ch <mika.leaf666@xxxxxxxxx>
Cc: ceph-users <ceph-users@xxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: How to observed civetweb.
Message-ID:
<CAGSyGfCZjs5C_DSYTkAA0rjyqhqYKsz+h3JCHbhrMqf3M5Hp8w@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
We haven't had the need to explore civetweb's SSL termination ability, so I
don't know the answer to your question.
Either way, haproxy is a safer bet.
*Kobi Laredo*
*Cloud Systems Engineer* | (*408) 409-KOBI*
On Tue, Sep 8, 2015 at 8:50 PM, Vickie ch <mika.leaf666@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Thanks a lot!!
> One more question. I can understand use haproxy is a better way for
> loadbalance.
> And github say civetweb already support https.
> But I found some documents mention that civetweb need haproxy for https.
> Which one is true?
>
>
>
> Best wishes,
> Mika
>
>
> 2015-09-09 2:21 GMT+08:00 Kobi Laredo <kobi.laredo@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>:
>
>> Vickie,
>>
>> You can add:
>> *access_log_file=/var/log/civetweb/access.log
>> error_log_file=/var/log/civetweb/error.log*
>>
>> to *rgw frontends* in ceph.conf though these logs are thin on info
>> (Source IP, date, and request)
>>
>> Check out
>> https://github.com/civetweb/civetweb/blob/master/docs/UserManual.md for
>> more civetweb configs you can inject through *rgw frontends* config
>> attribute in ceph.conf
>>
>> We are currently testing tuning civetweb's num_threads
>> and request_timeout_ms to improve radosgw performance
>>
>> *Kobi Laredo*
>> *Cloud Systems Engineer* | (*408) 409-KOBI*
>>
>> On Tue, Sep 8, 2015 at 8:20 AM, Yehuda Sadeh-Weinraub <yehuda@xxxxxxxxxx>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> You can increase the civetweb logs by adding 'debug civetweb = 10' in
>>> your ceph.conf. The output will go into the rgw logs.
>>>
>>> Yehuda
>>>
>>> On Tue, Sep 8, 2015 at 2:24 AM, Vickie ch <mika.leaf666@xxxxxxxxx>
>>> wrote:
>>> > Dear cephers,
>>> > Just upgrade radosgw from apache to civetweb.
>>> > It's really simple to installed and used. But I can't find any
>>> parameters or
>>> > logs to adjust(or observe) civetweb. (Like apache log). I'm really
>>> confuse.
>>> > Any ideas?
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > Best wishes,
>>> > Mika
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > _______________________________________________
>>> > ceph-users mailing list
>>> > ceph-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>> > http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com
>>> >
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> ceph-users mailing list
>>> ceph-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>> http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com
>>>
>>
>>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.ceph.com/pipermail/ceph-users-ceph.com/attachments/20150909/65384530/attachment.html>
------------------------------
_______________________________________________ ceph-users mailing list ceph-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com
