Re: НА: which SSD / experiences with Samsung 843T vs. Intel s3700

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hello,

On Fri, 4 Sep 2015 22:37:06 +0000 Межов Игорь Александрович wrote:

> Hi!
> 
> 
> Have worked with Intel DC S3700 200Gb. Due to budget restrictions, one
> 
> ssd hosts a system volume and 1:12 OSD journals. 6 nodes, 120Tb raw
> space.
>
Meaning you're limited to 360MB/s writes per node at best.
But yes, I do understand budget constraints. ^o^
 
> Cluster serves as RBD storage for ~100VM.
> 
> 
> Not a  single failure per year - all devices are healthy.
> 
> The remainig resource (by smart) is ~92%.
> 
I use 1:2 or 1:3 journals and haven't made any dent into my 200GB S3700
yet.

> 
> Now we're try to use DC S3710 for journals.

As I wrote a few days ago, unless you go for the 400GB version the the
200GB S3710 is actually slower (for journal purposes) than the 3700, as
sequential write speed is the key factor here.

Christian
-- 
Christian Balzer        Network/Systems Engineer                
chibi@xxxxxxx   	Global OnLine Japan/Fusion Communications
http://www.gol.com/
_______________________________________________
ceph-users mailing list
ceph-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com




[Index of Archives]     [Information on CEPH]     [Linux Filesystem Development]     [Ceph Development]     [Ceph Large]     [Ceph Dev]     [Linux USB Development]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [xfs]


  Powered by Linux