Re: Is Ceph appropriate for small installations?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Subject: Re: Is Ceph appropriate for small installations?
From: Marcin Przyczyna <mpr@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 02 Sep 2015 17:18:43 +0200
In-reply-to: <55E6EC07.5060608@infobright.com>
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Icedove/31.7.0

On 09/02/2015 02:31 PM, Janusz Borkowski wrote:
> Hi!
> 
> Do you have replication factor 2?

yes.

_______________________________________________
ceph-users mailing list
ceph-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com

References:
- Is Ceph appropriate for small installations?
  - From: Tony Nelson
- Re: Is Ceph appropriate for small installations?
  - From: Lindsay Mathieson
- Re: Is Ceph appropriate for small installations?
  - From: Alexandre DERUMIER
- Re: Is Ceph appropriate for small installations?
  - From: Wido den Hollander
- Re: Is Ceph appropriate for small installations?
  - From: Marcin Przyczyna
- Re: Is Ceph appropriate for small installations?
  - From: Janusz Borkowski

Prev by Date: Re: testing a crush rule against an out osd
Next by Date: Re: cephfs read-only setting doesn't work?
Previous by thread: Re: Is Ceph appropriate for small installations?
Next by thread: Re: S3：Permissions of access-key
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Information on CEPH] [Linux Filesystem Development] [Ceph Development] [Ceph Large] [Linux USB Development] [Video for Linux] [Linux Audio Users] [Yosemite News] [Linux Kernel] [Linux SCSI] [xfs]

Powered by Linux