I assume you filtered the log by thread? I don't see the response
messages. For the bucket check you can run radosgw-admin with
--log-to-stderr.
Can you also set 'debug objclass = 20' on the osds? You can do it by:
$ ceph tell osd.\* injectargs --debug-objclass 20
Also, it'd be interesting to get the following:
$ radosgw-admin bi list --bucket=<bucket name>
--object=abc_econtract/data/6shflrwbwwcm6dsemrpjit2li3v913iad1EZQ3.S6Prb-NXLvfQRlaWC5nBYp5
Thanks,
Yehuda
On Tue, Sep 1, 2015 at 10:44 AM, Sam Wouters <sam@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> not sure where I can find the logs for the bucket check, I can't really
> filter them out in the radosgw log.
>
> -Sam
>
> On 01-09-15 19:25, Sam Wouters wrote:
>> It looks like it, this is what shows in the logs after bumping the debug
>> and requesting a bucket list.
>>
>> 2015-09-01 17:14:53.008620 7fccb17ca700 10 cls_bucket_list
>> aws-cmis-prod(@{i=.be-east.rgw.buckets.index}.be-east.rgw.buckets[be-east.5436.1])
>> start
>> abc_econtract/data/6shflrwbwwcm6dsemrpjit2li3v913iad1EZQ3.S6Prb-NXLvfQRlaWC5nBYp5[]
>> num_entries 1
>> 2015-09-01 17:14:53.008629 7fccb17ca700 20 reading from
>> .be-east.rgw:.bucket.meta.aws-cmis-prod:be-east.5436.1
>> 2015-09-01 17:14:53.008636 7fccb17ca700 20 get_obj_state:
>> rctx=0x7fccb17c84d0
>> obj=.be-east.rgw:.bucket.meta.aws-cmis-prod:be-east.5436.1
>> state=0x7fcde01a4060 s->prefetch_data=0
>> 2015-09-01 17:14:53.008640 7fccb17ca700 10 cache get:
>> name=.be-east.rgw+.bucket.meta.aws-cmis-prod:be-east.5436.1 : hit
>> 2015-09-01 17:14:53.008645 7fccb17ca700 20 get_obj_state: s->obj_tag was
>> set empty
>> 2015-09-01 17:14:53.008647 7fccb17ca700 10 cache get:
>> name=.be-east.rgw+.bucket.meta.aws-cmis-prod:be-east.5436.1 : hit
>> 2015-09-01 17:14:53.008675 7fccb17ca700 1 -- 10.11.4.105:0/1109243 -->
>> 10.11.4.105:6801/39085 -- osd_op(client.55506.0:435874
>> ...
>> .dir.be-east.5436.1 [call rgw.bucket_list] 26.7d78fc84
>> ack+read+known_if_redirected e255) v5 -- ?+0 0x7fcde01a0540 con 0x3a2d870
>>
>> On 01-09-15 17:11, Yehuda Sadeh-Weinraub wrote:
>>> Can you bump up debug (debug rgw = 20, debug ms = 1), and see if the
>>> operations (bucket listing and bucket check) go into some kind of
>>> infinite loop?
>>>
>>> Yehuda
>>>
>>> On Tue, Sep 1, 2015 at 1:16 AM, Sam Wouters <sam@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>> Hi, I've started the bucket --check --fix on friday evening and it's
>>>> still running. 'ceph -s' shows the cluster health as OK, I don't know if
>>>> there is anything else I could check? Is there a way of finding out if
>>>> its actually doing something?
>>>>
>>>> We only have this issue on the one bucket with versioning enabled, I
>>>> can't get rid of the feeling it has something todo with that. The
>>>> "underscore bug" is also still present on that bucket
>>>> (http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/12819). Not sure if thats related in any
>>>> way.
>>>> Are there any alternatives, as for example copy all the objects into a
>>>> new bucket without versioning? Simple way would be to list the objects
>>>> and copy them to a new bucket, but bucket listing is not working so...
>>>>
>>>> -Sam
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On 31-08-15 10:47, Gregory Farnum wrote:
>>>>> This generally shouldn't be a problem at your bucket sizes. Have you
>>>>> checked that the cluster is actually in a healthy state? The sleeping
>>>>> locks are normal but should be getting woken up; if they aren't it
>>>>> means the object access isn't working for some reason. A down PG or
>>>>> something would be the simplest explanation.
>>>>> -Greg
>>>>>
>>>>> On Fri, Aug 28, 2015 at 6:52 PM, Sam Wouters <sam@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>>>> Ok, maybe I'm to impatient. It would be great if there were some verbose
>>>>>> or progress logging of the radosgw-admin tool.
>>>>>> I will start a check and let it run over the weekend.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> tnx,
>>>>>> Sam
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On 28-08-15 18:16, Sam Wouters wrote:
>>>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> this bucket only has 13389 objects, so the index size shouldn't be a
>>>>>>> problem. Also, on the same cluster we have an other bucket with 1200543
>>>>>>> objects (but no versioning configured), which has no issues.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> when we run a radosgw-admin bucket --check (--fix), nothing seems to be
>>>>>>> happening. Putting an strace on the process shows a lot of lines like these:
>>>>>>> [pid 99372] futex(0x2d730d4, FUTEX_WAIT_PRIVATE, 156619, NULL
>>>>>>> <unfinished ...>
>>>>>>> [pid 99385] futex(0x2da9410, FUTEX_WAIT_PRIVATE, 2, NULL <unfinished ...>
>>>>>>> [pid 99371] futex(0x2da9410, FUTEX_WAKE_PRIVATE, 1 <unfinished ...>
>>>>>>> [pid 99385] <... futex resumed> ) = -1 EAGAIN (Resource
>>>>>>> temporarily unavailable)
>>>>>>> [pid 99371] <... futex resumed> ) = 0
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> but no errors in the ceph logs or health warnings.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> r,
>>>>>>> Sam
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On 28-08-15 17:49, Ben Hines wrote:
>>>>>>>> How many objects in the bucket?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> RGW has problems with index size once number of objects gets into the
>>>>>>>> 900000+ level. The buckets need to be recreated with 'sharded bucket
>>>>>>>> indexes' on:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> rgw override bucket index max shards = 23
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> You could also try repairing the index with:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> radosgw-admin bucket check --fix --bucket=<bucketname>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> -Ben
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On Fri, Aug 28, 2015 at 8:38 AM, Sam Wouters <sam@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>>>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> we have a rgw bucket (with versioning) where PUT and GET operations for
>>>>>>>>> specific objects succeed, but retrieving an object list fails.
>>>>>>>>> Using python-boto, after a timeout just gives us an 500 internal error;
>>>>>>>>> radosgw-admin just hangs.
>>>>>>>>> Also a radosgw-admin bucket check just seems to hang...
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> ceph version is 0.94.3 but this also was happening with 0.94.2, we
>>>>>>>>> quietly hoped upgrading would fix but it didn't...
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> r,
>>>>>>>>> Sam
>>>>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>>>>> ceph-users mailing list
>>>>>>>>> ceph-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>>>>>>>> http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com
>>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>>> ceph-users mailing list
>>>>>>> ceph-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>>>>>> http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com
>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>> ceph-users mailing list
>>>>>> ceph-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>>>>> http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> ceph-users mailing list
>>>> ceph-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>>> http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com
>> _______________________________________________
>> ceph-users mailing list
>> ceph-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com
>
_______________________________________________
ceph-users mailing list
ceph-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com
