not sure where I can find the logs for the bucket check, I can't really
filter them out in the radosgw log.
-Sam
On 01-09-15 19:25, Sam Wouters wrote:
> It looks like it, this is what shows in the logs after bumping the debug
> and requesting a bucket list.
>
> 2015-09-01 17:14:53.008620 7fccb17ca700 10 cls_bucket_list
> aws-cmis-prod(@{i=.be-east.rgw.buckets.index}.be-east.rgw.buckets[be-east.5436.1])
> start
> abc_econtract/data/6shflrwbwwcm6dsemrpjit2li3v913iad1EZQ3.S6Prb-NXLvfQRlaWC5nBYp5[]
> num_entries 1
> 2015-09-01 17:14:53.008629 7fccb17ca700 20 reading from
> .be-east.rgw:.bucket.meta.aws-cmis-prod:be-east.5436.1
> 2015-09-01 17:14:53.008636 7fccb17ca700 20 get_obj_state:
> rctx=0x7fccb17c84d0
> obj=.be-east.rgw:.bucket.meta.aws-cmis-prod:be-east.5436.1
> state=0x7fcde01a4060 s->prefetch_data=0
> 2015-09-01 17:14:53.008640 7fccb17ca700 10 cache get:
> name=.be-east.rgw+.bucket.meta.aws-cmis-prod:be-east.5436.1 : hit
> 2015-09-01 17:14:53.008645 7fccb17ca700 20 get_obj_state: s->obj_tag was
> set empty
> 2015-09-01 17:14:53.008647 7fccb17ca700 10 cache get:
> name=.be-east.rgw+.bucket.meta.aws-cmis-prod:be-east.5436.1 : hit
> 2015-09-01 17:14:53.008675 7fccb17ca700 1 -- 10.11.4.105:0/1109243 -->
> 10.11.4.105:6801/39085 -- osd_op(client.55506.0:435874
> ...
> .dir.be-east.5436.1 [call rgw.bucket_list] 26.7d78fc84
> ack+read+known_if_redirected e255) v5 -- ?+0 0x7fcde01a0540 con 0x3a2d870
>
> On 01-09-15 17:11, Yehuda Sadeh-Weinraub wrote:
>> Can you bump up debug (debug rgw = 20, debug ms = 1), and see if the
>> operations (bucket listing and bucket check) go into some kind of
>> infinite loop?
>>
>> Yehuda
>>
>> On Tue, Sep 1, 2015 at 1:16 AM, Sam Wouters <sam@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>> Hi, I've started the bucket --check --fix on friday evening and it's
>>> still running. 'ceph -s' shows the cluster health as OK, I don't know if
>>> there is anything else I could check? Is there a way of finding out if
>>> its actually doing something?
>>>
>>> We only have this issue on the one bucket with versioning enabled, I
>>> can't get rid of the feeling it has something todo with that. The
>>> "underscore bug" is also still present on that bucket
>>> (http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/12819). Not sure if thats related in any
>>> way.
>>> Are there any alternatives, as for example copy all the objects into a
>>> new bucket without versioning? Simple way would be to list the objects
>>> and copy them to a new bucket, but bucket listing is not working so...
>>>
>>> -Sam
>>>
>>>
>>> On 31-08-15 10:47, Gregory Farnum wrote:
>>>> This generally shouldn't be a problem at your bucket sizes. Have you
>>>> checked that the cluster is actually in a healthy state? The sleeping
>>>> locks are normal but should be getting woken up; if they aren't it
>>>> means the object access isn't working for some reason. A down PG or
>>>> something would be the simplest explanation.
>>>> -Greg
>>>>
>>>> On Fri, Aug 28, 2015 at 6:52 PM, Sam Wouters <sam@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>>> Ok, maybe I'm to impatient. It would be great if there were some verbose
>>>>> or progress logging of the radosgw-admin tool.
>>>>> I will start a check and let it run over the weekend.
>>>>>
>>>>> tnx,
>>>>> Sam
>>>>>
>>>>> On 28-08-15 18:16, Sam Wouters wrote:
>>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> this bucket only has 13389 objects, so the index size shouldn't be a
>>>>>> problem. Also, on the same cluster we have an other bucket with 1200543
>>>>>> objects (but no versioning configured), which has no issues.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> when we run a radosgw-admin bucket --check (--fix), nothing seems to be
>>>>>> happening. Putting an strace on the process shows a lot of lines like these:
>>>>>> [pid 99372] futex(0x2d730d4, FUTEX_WAIT_PRIVATE, 156619, NULL
>>>>>> <unfinished ...>
>>>>>> [pid 99385] futex(0x2da9410, FUTEX_WAIT_PRIVATE, 2, NULL <unfinished ...>
>>>>>> [pid 99371] futex(0x2da9410, FUTEX_WAKE_PRIVATE, 1 <unfinished ...>
>>>>>> [pid 99385] <... futex resumed> ) = -1 EAGAIN (Resource
>>>>>> temporarily unavailable)
>>>>>> [pid 99371] <... futex resumed> ) = 0
>>>>>>
>>>>>> but no errors in the ceph logs or health warnings.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> r,
>>>>>> Sam
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On 28-08-15 17:49, Ben Hines wrote:
>>>>>>> How many objects in the bucket?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> RGW has problems with index size once number of objects gets into the
>>>>>>> 900000+ level. The buckets need to be recreated with 'sharded bucket
>>>>>>> indexes' on:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> rgw override bucket index max shards = 23
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> You could also try repairing the index with:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> radosgw-admin bucket check --fix --bucket=<bucketname>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> -Ben
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Fri, Aug 28, 2015 at 8:38 AM, Sam Wouters <sam@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> we have a rgw bucket (with versioning) where PUT and GET operations for
>>>>>>>> specific objects succeed, but retrieving an object list fails.
>>>>>>>> Using python-boto, after a timeout just gives us an 500 internal error;
>>>>>>>> radosgw-admin just hangs.
>>>>>>>> Also a radosgw-admin bucket check just seems to hang...
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> ceph version is 0.94.3 but this also was happening with 0.94.2, we
>>>>>>>> quietly hoped upgrading would fix but it didn't...
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> r,
>>>>>>>> Sam
>>>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>>>> ceph-users mailing list
>>>>>>>> ceph-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>>>>>>> http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com
>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>> ceph-users mailing list
>>>>>> ceph-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>>>>> http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> ceph-users mailing list
>>>>> ceph-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>>>> http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> ceph-users mailing list
>>> ceph-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>> http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com
> _______________________________________________
> ceph-users mailing list
> ceph-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com
_______________________________________________
ceph-users mailing list
ceph-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com
