On Sep 1, 2015 4:41 PM, "Janusz Borkowski" <janusz.borkowski@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Hi!
>
> open( ... O_APPEND) works fine in a single system. If many processes write to the same file, their output will never overwrite each other.
>
> On NFS overwriting is possible, as appending is only emulated - each write is preceded by a seek to the current file size and race condition may occur.
>
> How it is in cephfs?
CephFS generally ought to handle appends correctly. If it's not we will want to fix that.
>
> I have a file F opened with O_APPEND|O_WRONLY by some process. In a console I type
>
> $ echo "asd" >> F
>
> Effectively, this is opening of file F by another process with O_APPEND flag .
>
> The string "asd" is written to the beginning of file F, overwriting the starting bytes in the file. Is it a bug or a feature? If a feature, how it is described?
Are you doing this in the same box that's got the the file open, or a different one? Are you using the ceph-fuse or kernel clients on the systems?
I'm not sure how the shell actually handles >> so I'd like to see this reproduced with strace or an example program to be sure it's really not handling append properly.
-Greg
>
> It is ceph Hammer and kernel 3.10.0-229.11.1.el7.x86_64
>
> Thanks!
>
> J.
>
> _______________________________________________
> ceph-users mailing list
> ceph-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com
_______________________________________________ ceph-users mailing list ceph-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com
