Re: mds server(s) crashed

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, Aug 12, 2015 at 5:08 AM, Bob Ababurko <bob@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> What is risky about enabling mds_bal_frag on a cluster with data and will
> there be any performance degradation if enabled?

No specific gotchas, just that it is not something that has especially
good coverage in our automated tests.  We recently enabled it for our
general purpose tests (i.e. not specifically exercising fragmentation,
just normal fs workloads) and nothing's blown up horribly, but that's
about as far as the assurance goes.

Performance wise, there's a cost associated with splitting things up
and merging them, but a benefit associated with having smaller
fragments in general.  Probably doesn't make a huge difference outside
of the initial part where your existing large directories would all be
getting fragmented all of a sudden.

John
_______________________________________________
ceph-users mailing list
ceph-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com



[Index of Archives]     [Information on CEPH]     [Linux Filesystem Development]     [Ceph Development]     [Ceph Large]     [Ceph Dev]     [Linux USB Development]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [xfs]


  Powered by Linux