Re: CephFS posix test performance

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, Jun 30, 2015 at 6:57 AM, Yan, Zheng <zyan@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> I tried 4.1 kernel and 0.94.2 ceph-fuse. their performance are about the same.
>
> fuse:
> Files=191, Tests=1964, 60 wallclock secs ( 0.43 usr  0.08 sys +  1.16 cusr  0.65 csys =  2.32 CPU)
>
> kernel:
> Files=191, Tests=2286, 61 wallclock secs ( 0.45 usr  0.08 sys +  1.21 cusr  0.72 csys =  2.46 CPU)

On Friday, I tried stock 3.10 vs 4.1 and they were about the same as
well (a few tests failed in 3.10 though).  However Dan is using
3.10.0-229.7.2.el7.x86_64, which is 3.10 with a lot of backports, so
it's not quite the same.  Dan, are the numbers you are seeing
consistent?

Thanks,

                Ilya
_______________________________________________
ceph-users mailing list
ceph-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com



[Index of Archives]     [Information on CEPH]     [Linux Filesystem Development]     [Ceph Development]     [Ceph Large]     [Ceph Dev]     [Linux USB Development]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [xfs]


  Powered by Linux