On Fri, May 8, 2015 at 4:25 PM, Ilya Dryomov <idryomov@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Fri, May 8, 2015 at 4:13 PM, Vandeir Eduardo
> <vandeir.eduardo@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> Wouldn't be better a configuration named (map|unmap)_timeout? Cause we are
>> talking about a map/unmap of a RBD device, not a mount/unmount of a file
>> system.
>
> The mount_timeout option is already there and is used in cephfs. We
> could certainly add an unmap-specific option, I'm just not convinced it's
> worth a separate option. Some people still use those two terms
> interchangeably, and the meaning of mount_timeout when applied to rbd
> map/unmap would be sufficiently clear.
I'm not married to it though, more opinions are welcome!
Thanks,
Ilya
_______________________________________________
ceph-users mailing list
ceph-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com
