Re: Possible improvements for a slow write speed (excluding independent SSD journals)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi,

I'm just writing to you to stress out what others have already said, because it is very important that you take it very seriously.

On 20/04/15 19:17, J-P Methot wrote:
On 4/20/2015 11:01 AM, Christian Balzer wrote:

This is similar to another thread running right now, but since our
current setup is completely different from the one described in the
other thread, I thought it may be better to start a new one.

We are running Ceph Firefly 0.80.8 (soon to be upgraded to 0.80.9). We
have 6 OSD hosts with 16 OSD each (so a total of 96 OSDs). Each OSD is a
Samsung SSD 840 EVO on which I can reach write speeds of roughly 400
MB/sec, plugged in jbod on a controller that can theoretically transfer
at 6gb/sec. All of that is linked to openstack compute nodes on two
bonded 10gbps links (so a max transfer rate of 20 gbps).

I sure as hell hope you're not planning to write all that much to this
cluster.
But then again you're worried about write speed, so I guess you do.
Those _consumer_ SSDs will be dropping like flies, there are a number of
threads about them here.

They also might be of the kind that don't play well with O_DSYNC, I can't
recall for sure right now, check the archives.
Consumer SSDs universally tend to slow down quite a bit when not TRIM'ed and/or subjected to prolonged writes, like those generated by a benchmark.
I see, yes it looks like these SSDs are not the best for the job. We will not change them for now, but if they start failing, we will replace them with better ones.
I tried to put a Samsung 840 Pro 256GB in a ceph setup. It is supposed to be quite better than the EVO right? It was total crap. No "not the best for the job". TOTAL CRAP. :)

It can't give any useful write performance for a Ceph OSD. Spec sheet numbers don't matter for this, they don't work for ceph OSD, period. And yes, the drive is fine and works like a charm in workstation workloads.

I suggest you at least get some intel S3700/S3610 and use them for the journal of those samsung drives, I think that could help performance a lot.

Cheers
Eneko

--
Zuzendari Teknikoa / Director Técnico
Binovo IT Human Project, S.L.
Telf. 943575997
      943493611
Astigarraga bidea 2, planta 6 dcha., ofi. 3-2; 20180 Oiartzun (Gipuzkoa)
www.binovo.es

_______________________________________________
ceph-users mailing list
ceph-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com





[Index of Archives]     [Information on CEPH]     [Linux Filesystem Development]     [Ceph Development]     [Ceph Large]     [Ceph Dev]     [Linux USB Development]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [xfs]


  Powered by Linux