Re: Slow performance during recovery operations

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi,

On 04/06/15 02:26, Francois Lafont wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Lionel Bouton wrote :
>
>> Sorry this wasn't clear: I tried the ioprio settings before disabling
>> the deep scrubs and it didn't seem to make a difference when deep scrubs
>> occured.
> I have never tested these parameters (osd_disk_thread_ioprio_priority and
> osd_disk_thread_ioprio_class), but did you check that the I/O scheduler of
> the disks is cfq?

Yes I did.

>  Because, if I understand well, these parameters have no
> effect if the I/O scheduler is no cfq

AFAIK cfq is the only elevator supporting priorities in the mainline kernel.

>  and, for instance, in Ubuntu 14.04
> the I/O scheduler is deadline by default (not cfq).
>
> By the way, even if I don't use these parameters, should I use cfq I/O
> scheduler instead of deadline? Is there a best I/O scheduler for Ceph?

It probably depends on your actual workload. It may depend on your
hardware too: some benchmarks have shown it to perform faster on HDD but
slower than deadline or noop on SSD.

--
Lionel Bouton
_______________________________________________
ceph-users mailing list
ceph-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com




[Index of Archives]     [Information on CEPH]     [Linux Filesystem Development]     [Ceph Development]     [Ceph Large]     [Ceph Dev]     [Linux USB Development]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [xfs]


  Powered by Linux