Yes. On Wed, Mar 25, 2015 at 4:13 AM, Frédéric Nass <frederic.nass@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Hi Greg, > > Thank you for this clarification. It helps a lot. > > Does this "can't think of any issues" apply to both rbd and pool snapshots ? > > Frederic. > > ________________________________ > > On Tue, Mar 24, 2015 at 12:09 PM, Brendan Moloney <moloney@xxxxxxxx> wrote: >> >>> Hi Loic and Markus, >>> By the way, Inktank do not support snapshot of a pool with cache tiering >>> : >>> >>> * >>> https://download.inktank.com/docs/ICE%201.2%20-%20Cache%20and%20Erasure%20Coding%20FAQ.pdf >> >> Hi, >> >> You seem to be talking about pool snapshots rather than RBD snapshots. >> But in the linked document it is not clear that there is a distinction: >> >> Can I use snapshots with a cache tier? >> Snapshots are not supported in conjunction with cache tiers. >> >> Can anyone clarify if this is just pool snapshots? > > I think that was just a decision based on the newness and complexity > of the feature for product purposes. Snapshots against cache tiered > pools certainly should be fine in Giant/Hammer and we can't think of > any issues in Firefly off the tops of our heads. > -Greg > _______________________________________________ > ceph-users mailing list > ceph-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx > http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com > > > > > -- > > Cordialement, > > Frédéric Nass. > > > _______________________________________________ > ceph-users mailing list > ceph-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx > http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com > _______________________________________________ ceph-users mailing list ceph-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com
 |