From: ceph-users [mailto:ceph-users-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of John Spray On 04/03/2015 08:26, Nick Fisk wrote:
What are you hoping to gain from building something into ceph instead of using flashcache/bcache/dm-cache on top of it? It seems like since you would anyway need to handle your HA configuration, setting up the actual cache device would be the simple part. Hi John, I guess it’s to make things easier rather than having to run a huge stack of different technologies to achieve the same goal, especially when half of the caching logic is already in Ceph. It would be really nice and drive adoption if you could could add a SSD, set a config option and suddenly you have a storage platform that performs 10x faster. Another way of handling it might be for librbd to be pointed at a uuid instead of a /dev/sd* device. That way librbd knows what cache device to look for and will error out if the cache device is missing. These cache devices could then be presented to all necessary servers via iSCSI or something similar if the RBD will need to move around. Nick |
_______________________________________________ ceph-users mailing list ceph-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com