Re: Ceph Hammer OSD Shard Tuning Test Results

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Thanks Mark for the results,
default values seem to be quite resonable indeed.


I also wonder is cpu frequency can have an impact on latency or not.
I'm going to benchmark on dual xeon 10-cores 3,1ghz nodes in coming weeks,
I'll try replay your benchmark to compare



----- Mail original -----
De: "Mark Nelson" <mnelson@xxxxxxxxxx>
À: "ceph-devel" <ceph-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "ceph-users" <ceph-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Envoyé: Jeudi 26 Février 2015 05:44:15
Objet:  Ceph Hammer OSD Shard Tuning Test Results

Hi Everyone, 

In the Ceph Dumpling/Firefly/Hammer SSD/Memstore performance comparison 
thread, Alexandre DERUMIER wondered if changing the default shard and 
threads per shard OSD settings might have a positive effect on 
performance in our tests. I went back and used one of the PCIe SSDs 
from our previous tests to experiment with a recent master pull. I 
wanted to know how performance was affected by changing these parameters 
and also to validate that the default settings still appear to be correct. 

I plan to conduct more tests (potentially across multiple SATA SSDs in 
the same box), but these initial results seem to show that the default 
settings that were chosen are quite reasonable. 

Mark 

_______________________________________________ 
ceph-users mailing list 
ceph-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx 
http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com 

_______________________________________________
ceph-users mailing list
ceph-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com





[Index of Archives]     [Information on CEPH]     [Linux Filesystem Development]     [Ceph Development]     [Ceph Large]     [Ceph Dev]     [Linux USB Development]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [xfs]


  Powered by Linux