On 11 February 2015 at 20:43, John Spray <john.spray@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Namespaces in CephFS would become useful in conjunction with limiting > client authorization by sub-mount -- that way subdirectories could be > assigned a layout with a particular namespace, and a client could be > limited to that namespace on the OSD side and that path on the MDS > side. Agreed, that was exactly how I imagined it might work. Sounds particularly useful in the context of a service like Manila. But as I said, it's pretty important for RBD as well - creating multiple pools to isolate clients doesn't scale very far at all. -- Cheers, ~Blairo _______________________________________________ ceph-users mailing list ceph-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com
 |