Re: snapshoting on btrfs vs xfs

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, 5 Feb 2015, Lindsay Mathieson wrote:
> On 5 February 2015 at 07:22, Sage Weil <sage@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>       > Is the snapshoting performed by ceph or by the fs? Can we
>       switch to
>       > xfs and have the same capabilities: instant snapshot + instant
>       boot
>       > from snapshot?
> 
>       The feature set and capabilities are identical.  The difference
>       is that on
>       btrfs we are letting btrfs do the efficient copy-on-write
>       cloning when we
>       touch a snapshotted object while with XFS we literally copy the
>       object
>       file (usually 4MB) on the first write. 
> 
> Are ceph snapshots really that much faster when using btrfs underneath? one
> of the problem we have with ceph is that snapshot take/restore is insanely
> slow, tens of minutes - but we are using xfs.

What API are you using?  Creating RBD  snaps should be very fast.

sage
_______________________________________________
ceph-users mailing list
ceph-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com

[Index of Archives]     [Information on CEPH]     [Linux Filesystem Development]     [Ceph Development]     [Ceph Large]     [Ceph Dev]     [Linux USB Development]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [xfs]


  Powered by Linux