Re: Is there an negative relationship between storage utilization and ceph performance?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi,

you can reduce reserved space for ext4 via tune2fs and gain a little
more space, up to 5%. By the way, if you are using Centos7, it
reserves ridiculously high disk percentage for ext4 (at least during
instalation). Performance probably should be compared on smaller
allocsize mount option for xfs (32..512k) and comparison should be
made for long runs (like weeks of small writes from a bunch of clients
to reach bad enough fragmentation ratio). When I measured comparable
results last time, it was a bobtail era, and XFS started to decrease
operation speed on about 40% of real allocation. If you prefer to use
rados bench, real-life fragmentation may be achieved by running
multiple benches with small block size simultaneously in different
pools over same set of OSDs.
_______________________________________________
ceph-users mailing list
ceph-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com



[Index of Archives]     [Information on CEPH]     [Linux Filesystem Development]     [Ceph Development]     [Ceph Large]     [Linux USB Development]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [xfs]


  Powered by Linux