Re: xfs/nobarrier

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Sat, 27 Dec 2014 04:59:51 PM you wrote:
> Power supply means bigger capex and less redundancy, as the emergency
> procedure in case of power failure is less deterministic than with
> controlled battery-backed cache. 

Yes, the whole  auto shut-down procedure is rather more complex and fragile 
for a UPS than a controller cache

> Anyway XFS nobarrier
> does not bring enough performance boost to be enabled by my
> experience.

It makes a non-trivial difference on my (admittedly slow) setup, with write 
bandwidth going from 35 MB/s to 51 MB/s

-- 
Lindsay

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.

_______________________________________________
ceph-users mailing list
ceph-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com

[Index of Archives]     [Information on CEPH]     [Linux Filesystem Development]     [Ceph Development]     [Ceph Large]     [Ceph Dev]     [Linux USB Development]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [xfs]


  Powered by Linux