Re: xfs/nobarrier

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Power supply means bigger capex and less redundancy, as the emergency
procedure in case of power failure is less deterministic than with
controlled battery-backed cache. Cache battery is smaller and way more
predictable for a health measurements than a UPS (if passes internal
check, it will be *always* enough to keep memory powered for a while,
but UPS requires periodical battle testing, if you want to know that
it still be able to hold power failure, with two power lanes should be
safe enough, simply because device itself has more complex structure
than a battery with a single voltage stabilizer). Anyway XFS nobarrier
does not bring enough performance boost to be enabled by my
experience.
_______________________________________________
ceph-users mailing list
ceph-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com



[Index of Archives]     [Information on CEPH]     [Linux Filesystem Development]     [Ceph Development]     [Ceph Large]     [Ceph Dev]     [Linux USB Development]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [xfs]


  Powered by Linux