Hello list, I am a bit wondering about "ceph-deploy" and the development of ceph: I see that many people in the community are pushing towards the use of ceph-deploy, likely to ease use of ceph. However, I have run multiple times into issues using ceph-deploy, when it failed or incorrectly setup partitions or created a cluster of monitors that never reach a qurom. I have also recognised debugging and learning of ceph being much more difficult with ceph-deploy, compared to going the manual way, because as a user I miss a lot of information. Furthermore as the maintainer of a configuration management system [0], I am interested in knowing how things are working behind the scenes to be able to automate them. Thus I was wondering, if it is an option for the ceph community to focus on both (the manual & ceph-deploy) way instead of just pushing ceph-deploy? Cheers, Nico p.s.: Loic, just taking your mail as an example, but it is not personal - just want to show my point. Loic Dachary [Sun, Dec 21, 2014 at 06:08:27PM +0100]: > [...] > > Is there a reason why you need to do this instead of letting ceph-disk prepare do it for you ? > > [...] -- New PGP key: 659B 0D91 E86E 7E24 FD15 69D0 C729 21A1 293F 2D24 _______________________________________________ ceph-users mailing list ceph-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com
 |