Re: Have 2 different public networks

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 





On Thu, Dec 18, 2014 at 10:47 PM, Francois Lafont <flafdivers@xxxxxxx> wrote:
Le 19/12/2014 02:18, Craig Lewis a écrit :
> The daemons bind to *,

Yes but *only* for the OSD daemon. Am I wrong?

Personally I must provide IP addresses for the monitors
in the /etc/ceph/ceph.conf, like this:

[global]
mon host = 10.0.1.1, 10.0.1.2, 10.0.1.3

Or like this:

[mon.1]
mon addr = 10.0.1.1
[mon.2]
mon addr = 10.0.1.2
[mon.3]
mon addr = 10.0.1.3

I'm not using mon addr lines, and my ceph-mon daemons are bound to 0.0.0.0:*.  I have no [mon.#] or [osd.#] sections at all.

I do have the global mon host line.  On the management nodes, try putting the 10.0.2.0/24 addresses there instead of the 10.0.1.0/24 addresses.


> Do you really plan on having enough traffic creating and deleting RDB
> images that you need a dedicated network?  It seems like setting up link
> aggregation on 10.0.1.0/24 would be simpler and less error prone.

This is not for traffic. I must have a node to manage rbd images and this
node is in a different VLAN (this is an Openstack install... I try... ;).


If it's not a traffic volume problem, can you allow the 10.0.2.0/24 network to route to the 10.0.1.0/24 network, and open the firewall enough? There should be enough info in the network config to get the firewall working: http://docs.ceph.com/docs/next/rados/configuration/network-config-ref/
_______________________________________________
ceph-users mailing list
ceph-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com

[Index of Archives]     [Information on CEPH]     [Linux Filesystem Development]     [Ceph Development]     [Ceph Large]     [Ceph Dev]     [Linux USB Development]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [xfs]


  Powered by Linux