Hello, On Mon, 15 Dec 2014 09:23:23 +0100 Josef Johansson wrote: > Hi Christian, > > We’re using Proxmox that has support for HA, they do it per-vm. > We’re doing it manually right now though, because we like it :). > > When I looked at it I couldn’t see a way of just allowing a set of hosts > in the HA (i.e. not the storage nodes), but that’s probably easy to > solve. > Ah, Proxmox. I test drove this about a year ago and while it has some nice features the "black box" approach of taking over bare metal hardware and the ancient kernel doesn't mesh with other needs I have here. Thanks for reminding me, though. Christian > Cheers, > Josef > > > On 15 Dec 2014, at 04:10, Christian Balzer <chibi@xxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > > > Hello, > > > > What are people here using to provide HA KVMs (and with that I mean > > automatic, fast VM failover in case of host node failure) in with RBD > > images? > > > > Openstack and ganeti have decent Ceph/RBD support, but no HA (plans > > aplenty though). > > > > I have plenty of experience with Pacemaker (DRBD backed) but there is > > only an unofficial RBD resource agent for it, which also only supports > > kernel based RBD. > > And while Pacemaker works great, it scales like leaden porcupines, > > things degrade rapidly after 20 or so instances. > > > > So what are other people here using to keep their KVM based VMs up and > > running all the time? > > > > Regards, > > > > Christian > > -- > > Christian Balzer Network/Systems Engineer > > chibi@xxxxxxx Global OnLine Japan/Fusion Communications > > http://www.gol.com/ > > _______________________________________________ > > ceph-users mailing list > > ceph-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx > > http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com > > -- Christian Balzer Network/Systems Engineer chibi@xxxxxxx Global OnLine Japan/Fusion Communications http://www.gol.com/ _______________________________________________ ceph-users mailing list ceph-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com
 |