Re: RBD and HA KVM anybody?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi Christian,

We’re using Proxmox that has support for HA, they do it per-vm.
We’re doing it manually right now though, because we like it :). 

When I looked at it I couldn’t see a way of just allowing a set of hosts in the HA (i.e. not the storage nodes), but that’s probably easy to solve.

Cheers,
Josef

> On 15 Dec 2014, at 04:10, Christian Balzer <chibi@xxxxxxx> wrote:
> 
> 
> Hello,
> 
> What are people here using to provide HA KVMs (and with that I mean
> automatic, fast VM failover in case of host node failure) in with RBD
> images?
> 
> Openstack and ganeti have decent Ceph/RBD support, but no HA (plans
> aplenty though).
> 
> I have plenty of experience with Pacemaker (DRBD backed) but there is only
> an unofficial RBD resource agent for it, which also only supports kernel
> based RBD. 
> And while Pacemaker works great, it scales like leaden porcupines, things
> degrade rapidly after 20 or so instances.
> 
> So what are other people here using to keep their KVM based VMs up and
> running all the time?
> 
> Regards,
> 
> Christian
> -- 
> Christian Balzer        Network/Systems Engineer                
> chibi@xxxxxxx   	Global OnLine Japan/Fusion Communications
> http://www.gol.com/
> _______________________________________________
> ceph-users mailing list
> ceph-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com

_______________________________________________
ceph-users mailing list
ceph-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com





[Index of Archives]     [Information on CEPH]     [Linux Filesystem Development]     [Ceph Development]     [Ceph Large]     [Ceph Dev]     [Linux USB Development]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [xfs]


  Powered by Linux