Re: Deleting buckets and objects fails to reduce reported cluster usage

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, Nov 27, 2014 at 2:15 PM, b <b@benjackson.email> wrote:
> On 2014-11-27 11:36, Yehuda Sadeh wrote:
>>
>> On Wed, Nov 26, 2014 at 3:49 PM, b <b@benjackson.email> wrote:
>>>
>>> On 2014-11-27 10:21, Yehuda Sadeh wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Wed, Nov 26, 2014 at 3:09 PM, b <b@benjackson.email> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On 2014-11-27 09:38, Yehuda Sadeh wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Wed, Nov 26, 2014 at 2:32 PM, b <b@benjackson.email> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I've been deleting a bucket which originally had 60TB of data in it,
>>>>>>> with
>>>>>>> our cluster doing only 1 replication, the total usage was 120TB.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I've been deleting the objects slowly using S3 browser, and I can see
>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>> bucket usage is now down to around 2.5TB or 5TB with duplication, but
>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>> usage in the cluster has not changed.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I've looked at garbage collection (radosgw-admin gc list --include
>>>>>>> all)
>>>>>>> and
>>>>>>> it just reports square brackets "[]"
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I've run radosgw-admin temp remove --date=2014-11-20, and it doesn't
>>>>>>> appear
>>>>>>> to have any effect.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Is there a way to check where this space is being consumed?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Running 'ceph df' the USED space in the buckets pool is not showing
>>>>>>> any
>>>>>>> of
>>>>>>> the 57TB that should have been freed up from the deletion so far.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Running 'radosgw-admin bucket stats | jshon | grep size_kb_actual'
>>>>>>> and
>>>>>>> adding up all the buckets usage, this shows that the space has been
>>>>>>> freed
>>>>>>> from the bucket, but the cluster is all sorts of messed up.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> ANY IDEAS? What can I look at?
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Can you run 'radosgw-admin gc list --include-all'?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Yehuda
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> I've done it before, and it just returns square brackets [] (see below)
>>>>>
>>>>> radosgw-admin gc list --include-all
>>>>> []
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Do you know which of the rados pools have all that extra data? Try to
>>>> list that pool's objects, verify that there are no surprises there
>>>> (e.g., use 'rados -p <pool> ls').
>>>>
>>>> Yehuda
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> I'm just running that command now, and its taking some time. There is a
>>> large number of objects.
>>>
>>> Once it has finished, what should I be looking for?
>>
>>
>> I assume the pool in question is the one that holds your objects data?
>> You should be looking for objects that are not expected to exist
>> anymore, and objects of buckets that don't exist anymore. The problem
>> here is to identify these.
>> I suggest starting by looking at all the existing buckets, compose a
>> list of all the bucket prefixes for the existing buckets, and try to
>> look whether there are objects that have different prefixes.
>>
>> Yehuda
>
>
> Any ideas? I've found the prefix, the number of objects in the pool that
> match that prefix numbers in the 21 millions
> The actual 'radosgw-admin bucket stats' command reports it as only having
> 1.2 million.

Well, the objects you're seeing are raw objects, and since rgw stripes
the data, it is expected to have more raw objects than objects in the
bucket. Still, it seems that you have much too many of these. You can
try to check whether there are pending multipart uploads that were
never completed using the S3 api.
At the moment there's no easy way to figure out which raw objects are
not supposed to exist. The process would be like this:
1. rados ls -p <data pool>
keep the list sorted
2. list objects in the bucket
3. for each object in (2), do: radosgw-admin object stat
--bucket=<bucket> --object=<object> --rgw-cache-enabled=false
(disabling the cache so that it goes quicker)
4. look at the result of (3), and generate a list of all the parts.
5. sort result of (4), compare it to (1)

Note that if you're running firefly or later, the raw objects are not
specified explicitly in the command you run at (3), so you might need
a different procedure, e.g., find out the raw objects random string
that is being used, remove it from the list generated in 1, etc.)

That's basically it.
I'll be interested to figure out what happened, why the garbage
collection didn't work correctly. You could try verifying that it's
working by:
 - create an object (let's say ~10MB in size).
 - radosgw-admin object stat --bucket=<bucket> --object=<object>
   (keep this info, see
 - remove the object
 - run radosgw-admin gc list --include-all and verify that the raw
parts are listed there
 - wait a few hours, repeat last step, see that the parts don't appear
there anymore
 - run rados -p <pool> ls, check to see if the raw objects still exist

Yehuda

>
> Not sure where to go from here, and our cluster is slowly filling up while
> not clearing any space.
_______________________________________________
ceph-users mailing list
ceph-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com




[Index of Archives]     [Information on CEPH]     [Linux Filesystem Development]     [Ceph Development]     [Ceph Large]     [Ceph Dev]     [Linux USB Development]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [xfs]


  Powered by Linux