Hi, this is with intel 10GBE bondet (2x10Gbit/s) network. rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 0.053/0.107/0.184/0.034 ms I thought that the mellanox stuff had lower latencies. Stefan Am 06.11.2014 um 18:09 schrieb Robert LeBlanc: > rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 0.130/0.157/0.190/0.016 ms > > IPoIB Mellanox ConnectX-3 MT27500 FDR adapter and Mellanox IS5022 QDR > switch MTU set to 65520. CentOS 7.0.1406 > running 3.17.2-1.el7.elrepo.x86_64 on Intel(R) Atom(TM) CPU C2750 with > 32 GB of RAM. > > On Thu, Nov 6, 2014 at 9:46 AM, Udo Lembke <ulembke@xxxxxxxxxxxx > <mailto:ulembke@xxxxxxxxxxxx>> wrote: > > Hi, > no special optimizations on the host. > In this case the pings are from an proxmox-ve host to ceph-osds > (ubuntu + debian). > > The pings from one osd to the others are comparable. > > Udo > > On 06.11.2014 15:00, Irek Fasikhov wrote: >> Hi,Udo. >> Good value :) >> >> Whether an additional optimization on the host? >> Thanks. >> >> Thu Nov 06 2014 at 16:57:36, Udo Lembke <ulembke@xxxxxxxxxxxx >> <mailto:ulembke@xxxxxxxxxxxx>>: >> >> Hi, >> from one host to five OSD-hosts. >> >> NIC Intel 82599EB; jumbo-frames; single Switch IBM G8124 >> (blade network). >> >> rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 0.075/0.114/0.231/0.037 ms >> rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 0.088/0.164/0.739/0.072 ms >> rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 0.081/0.141/0.229/0.030 ms >> rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 0.083/0.115/0.183/0.030 ms >> rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 0.087/0.144/0.190/0.028 ms >> >> >> Udo >> > > > _______________________________________________ > ceph-users mailing list > ceph-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx <mailto:ceph-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com > > > > > _______________________________________________ > ceph-users mailing list > ceph-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx > http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com > _______________________________________________ ceph-users mailing list ceph-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com
 |