Yes, that`s right guess - crushmap is imagining both OSDs on a single host, although daemon on the second host was able to act as up/in when crushmap placed it on a different host, looks as a weird placement miscalculation during update. _______________________________________________ ceph-users mailing list ceph-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com