You can deploy multiple RadosGW in a single cluster. You'll need to setup zones (see http://ceph.com/docs/master/radosgw/federated-config/). Most people seem to be using zones for geo-replication, but local replication works even better. Multiple zones don't have to be replicated either. For example, you could use multiple zones for tiered services. For example, a service with 4x replication on pure SSDs, and a cheaper service with 2x replication on HDDs.
If you do have separate zones in a single cluster, you'll want to configure different OSDs to serve the different zones. You want fault isolation between the zones. The problems this brings are mostly management of the extra complexity.
CivetWeb is embedded into the RadosGW daemon, where as Apache talks to RadosGW using FastCGI. Overall, CivetWeb should be simpler to setup and manage, since it doesn't require Apache, it's configuration, or the overhead.
I don't know if Civetweb is considered production ready. Giant has a bunch of fixes for Civetweb, so I'm leaning towards "not on Firefly" unless somebody more knowledgeable tells me otherwise.
On Thu, Oct 23, 2014 at 11:04 PM, yuelongguang <fastsync@xxxxxxx> wrote:
hi,yehuda1.can we deploy multi-rgws on one ceph cluster?if so does it bring us any problems?2. what is the major difference between apache and civetweb?what is civetweb's advantage?thanks
_______________________________________________
ceph-users mailing list
ceph-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com
_______________________________________________ ceph-users mailing list ceph-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com
