pool size/min_size does not make any effect on erasure-coded pool, right?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Subject: pool size/min_size does not make any effect on erasure-coded pool, right?
From: yuelongguang <fastsync@xxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 16 Oct 2014 18:42:26 +0800 (CST)

hi,all

pool size/min_size does not make any effect on erasure-coded pool,right?

thanks

_______________________________________________
ceph-users mailing list
ceph-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com

Follow-Ups:
- Re: pool size/min_size does not make any effect on erasure-coded pool, right?
  - From: yuelongguang

Prev by Date: Re: mds isn't working anymore after osd's running full
Next by Date: Re: Replacing a disk: Best practices?
Previous by thread: Use case: one-way RADOS "replication" between two clusters by time period
Next by thread: Re: pool size/min_size does not make any effect on erasure-coded pool, right?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Information on CEPH] [Linux Filesystem Development] [Ceph Development] [Ceph Large] [Ceph Dev] [Linux USB Development] [Video for Linux] [Linux Audio Users] [Yosemite News] [Linux Kernel] [Linux SCSI] [xfs]

Powered by Linux