I?tested osd with btrfs, looks like the write performance is a little bit faste than xfs, but there are a lot of painful problem like: 1. restart osd take about 1 - 2 hours 2. osd will down everday 3. etc. ------------------ ???? ------------------ ???: "Andrew Thrift";<andrew at networklabs.co.nz>; ????: 2014?9?5?(???) ??11:26 ???: "Andrei Mikhailovsky"<andrei at arhont.com>; ??: "ceph-users"<ceph-users at lists.ceph.com>; ??: Re: Cache pool and using btrfs for ssd osds I have recently been wondering the same thing. Does anyone have any experience with this ? On Fri, Sep 5, 2014 at 12:18 AM, Andrei Mikhailovsky <andrei at arhont.com> wrote: Hello guys, I was wondering if there is a benefit of using journal-less btrfs file system on the cache pool osds? Would it speed up the writes to the cache tier? Is btrfs and ceph getting close to production level? Cheers Andrei _______________________________________________ ceph-users mailing list ceph-users at lists.ceph.com http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.ceph.com/pipermail/ceph-users-ceph.com/attachments/20140905/89ada5c4/attachment.htm>
 |