On Fri, 15 Aug 2014, Haomai Wang wrote:
> Hi Kenneth,
>
> I don't find valuable info in your logs, it lack of the necessary
> debug output when accessing crash code.
>
> But I scan the encode/decode implementation in GenericObjectMap and
> find something bad.
>
> For example, two oid has same hash and their name is:
> A: "rb.data.123"
> B: "rb-123"
>
> In ghobject_t compare level, A < B. But GenericObjectMap encode "." to
> "%e", so the key in DB is:
> A: _GHOBJTOSEQ_:blah!51615000!!none!!rb%edata%e123!head
> B: _GHOBJTOSEQ_:blah!51615000!!none!!rb-123!head
>
> A > B
>
> And it seemed that the escape function is useless and should be disabled.
>
> I'm not sure whether Kenneth's problem is touching this bug. Because
> this scene only occur when the object set is very large and make the
> two object has same hash value.
>
> Kenneth, could you have time to run "ceph-kv-store [path-to-osd] list
> _GHOBJTOSEQ_| grep 6adb1100 -A 100". ceph-kv-store is a debug tool
> which can be compiled from source. You can clone ceph repo and run
> "./authongen.sh; ./configure; cd src; make ceph-kvstore-tool".
> "path-to-osd" should be "/var/lib/ceph/osd-[id]/current/". "6adb1100"
> is from your verbose log and the next 100 rows should know necessary
> infos.
You can also get ceph-kvstore-tool from the 'ceph-tests' package.
> Hi sage, do you think we need to provided with upgrade function to fix it?
Hmm, we might. This only affects the key/value encoding right? The
FileStore is using its own function to map these to file names?
Can you open a ticket in the tracker for this?
Thanks!
sage
>
>
> On Thu, Aug 14, 2014 at 7:36 PM, Kenneth Waegeman
> <Kenneth.Waegeman at ugent.be> wrote:
>
> >
> > ----- Message from Haomai Wang <haomaiwang at gmail.com> ---------
> > Date: Thu, 14 Aug 2014 19:11:55 +0800
> >
> > From: Haomai Wang <haomaiwang at gmail.com>
> > Subject: Re: [ceph-users] ceph cluster inconsistency?
> > To: Kenneth Waegeman <Kenneth.Waegeman at ugent.be>
> >
> >
> >> Could you add config "debug_keyvaluestore = 20/20" to the crashed osd
> >> and replay the command causing crash?
> >>
> >> I would like to get more debug infos! Thanks.
> >
> >
> > I included the log in attachment!
> > Thanks!
> >
> >>
> >> On Thu, Aug 14, 2014 at 4:41 PM, Kenneth Waegeman
> >> <Kenneth.Waegeman at ugent.be> wrote:
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> I have:
> >>> osd_objectstore = keyvaluestore-dev
> >>>
> >>> in the global section of my ceph.conf
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> [root at ceph002 ~]# ceph osd erasure-code-profile get profile11
> >>> directory=/usr/lib64/ceph/erasure-code
> >>> k=8
> >>> m=3
> >>> plugin=jerasure
> >>> ruleset-failure-domain=osd
> >>> technique=reed_sol_van
> >>>
> >>> the ecdata pool has this as profile
> >>>
> >>> pool 3 'ecdata' erasure size 11 min_size 8 crush_ruleset 2 object_hash
> >>> rjenkins pg_num 128 pgp_num 128 last_change 161 flags hashpspool
> >>> stripe_width 4096
> >>>
> >>> ECrule in crushmap
> >>>
> >>> rule ecdata {
> >>> ruleset 2
> >>> type erasure
> >>> min_size 3
> >>> max_size 20
> >>> step set_chooseleaf_tries 5
> >>> step take default-ec
> >>> step choose indep 0 type osd
> >>> step emit
> >>> }
> >>> root default-ec {
> >>> id -8 # do not change unnecessarily
> >>> # weight 140.616
> >>> alg straw
> >>> hash 0 # rjenkins1
> >>> item ceph001-ec weight 46.872
> >>> item ceph002-ec weight 46.872
> >>> item ceph003-ec weight 46.872
> >>> ...
> >>>
> >>> Cheers!
> >>> Kenneth
> >>>
> >>> ----- Message from Haomai Wang <haomaiwang at gmail.com> ---------
> >>> Date: Thu, 14 Aug 2014 10:07:50 +0800
> >>> From: Haomai Wang <haomaiwang at gmail.com>
> >>> Subject: Re: [ceph-users] ceph cluster inconsistency?
> >>> To: Kenneth Waegeman <Kenneth.Waegeman at ugent.be>
> >>> Cc: ceph-users <ceph-users at lists.ceph.com>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>> Hi Kenneth,
> >>>>
> >>>> Could you give your configuration related to EC and KeyValueStore?
> >>>> Not sure whether it's bug on KeyValueStore
> >>>>
> >>>> On Thu, Aug 14, 2014 at 12:06 AM, Kenneth Waegeman
> >>>> <Kenneth.Waegeman at ugent.be> wrote:
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Hi,
> >>>>>
> >>>>> I was doing some tests with rados bench on a Erasure Coded pool (using
> >>>>> keyvaluestore-dev objectstore) on 0.83, and I see some strangs things:
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>> [root at ceph001 ~]# ceph status
> >>>>> cluster 82766e04-585b-49a6-a0ac-c13d9ffd0a7d
> >>>>> health HEALTH_WARN too few pgs per osd (4 < min 20)
> >>>>> monmap e1: 3 mons at
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>> {ceph001=10.141.8.180:6789/0,ceph002=10.141.8.181:6789/0,ceph003=10.141.8.182:6789/0},
> >>>>> election epoch 6, quorum 0,1,2 ceph001,ceph002,ceph003
> >>>>> mdsmap e116: 1/1/1 up {0=ceph001.cubone.os=up:active}, 2
> >>>>> up:standby
> >>>>> osdmap e292: 78 osds: 78 up, 78 in
> >>>>> pgmap v48873: 320 pgs, 4 pools, 15366 GB data, 3841 kobjects
> >>>>> 1381 GB used, 129 TB / 131 TB avail
> >>>>> 320 active+clean
> >>>>>
> >>>>> There is around 15T of data, but only 1.3 T usage.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> This is also visible in rados:
> >>>>>
> >>>>> [root at ceph001 ~]# rados df
> >>>>> pool name category KB objects clones
> >>>>> degraded unfound rd rd KB wr wr
> >>>>> KB
> >>>>> data - 0 0 0
> >>>>> 0 0 0 0 0 0
> >>>>> ecdata - 16113451009 3933959 0
> >>>>> 0 0 1 1 3935632 16116850711
> >>>>> metadata - 2 20 0
> >>>>> 0 0 33 36 21 8
> >>>>> rbd - 0 0 0
> >>>>> 0 0 0 0 0 0
> >>>>> total used 1448266016 3933979
> >>>>> total avail 139400181016
> >>>>> total space 140848447032
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Another (related?) thing: if I do rados -p ecdata ls, I trigger osd
> >>>>> shutdowns (each time):
> >>>>> I get a list followed by an error:
> >>>>>
> >>>>> ...
> >>>>> benchmark_data_ceph001.cubone.os_8961_object243839
> >>>>> benchmark_data_ceph001.cubone.os_5560_object801983
> >>>>> benchmark_data_ceph001.cubone.os_31461_object856489
> >>>>> benchmark_data_ceph001.cubone.os_8961_object202232
> >>>>> benchmark_data_ceph001.cubone.os_4919_object33199
> >>>>> benchmark_data_ceph001.cubone.os_5560_object807797
> >>>>> benchmark_data_ceph001.cubone.os_4919_object74729
> >>>>> benchmark_data_ceph001.cubone.os_31461_object1264121
> >>>>> benchmark_data_ceph001.cubone.os_5560_object1318513
> >>>>> benchmark_data_ceph001.cubone.os_5560_object1202111
> >>>>> benchmark_data_ceph001.cubone.os_31461_object939107
> >>>>> benchmark_data_ceph001.cubone.os_31461_object729682
> >>>>> benchmark_data_ceph001.cubone.os_5560_object122915
> >>>>> benchmark_data_ceph001.cubone.os_5560_object76521
> >>>>> benchmark_data_ceph001.cubone.os_5560_object113261
> >>>>> benchmark_data_ceph001.cubone.os_31461_object575079
> >>>>> benchmark_data_ceph001.cubone.os_5560_object671042
> >>>>> benchmark_data_ceph001.cubone.os_5560_object381146
> >>>>> 2014-08-13 17:57:48.736150 7f65047b5700 0 -- 10.141.8.180:0/1023295 >>
> >>>>> 10.141.8.182:6839/4471 pipe(0x7f64fc019b20 sd=5 :0 s=1 pgs=0 cs=0 l=1
> >>>>> c=0x7f64fc019db0).fault
> >>>>>
> >>>>> And I can see this in the log files:
> >>>>>
> >>>>> -25> 2014-08-13 17:52:56.323908 7f8a97fa4700 1 --
> >>>>> 10.143.8.182:6827/64670 <== osd.57 10.141.8.182:0/15796 51 ====
> >>>>> osd_ping(ping e220 stamp 2014-08-13 17:52:56.323092) v2 ==== 47+0+0
> >>>>> (3227325175 0 0) 0xf475940 con 0xee89fa0
> >>>>> -24> 2014-08-13 17:52:56.323938 7f8a97fa4700 1 --
> >>>>> 10.143.8.182:6827/64670 --> 10.141.8.182:0/15796 -- osd_ping(ping_reply
> >>>>> e220
> >>>>> stamp 2014-08-13 17:52:56.323092) v2 -- ?+0 0xf815b00 con 0xee89fa0
> >>>>> -23> 2014-08-13 17:52:56.324078 7f8a997a7700 1 --
> >>>>> 10.141.8.182:6840/64670 <== osd.57 10.141.8.182:0/15796 51 ====
> >>>>> osd_ping(ping e220 stamp 2014-08-13 17:52:56.323092) v2 ==== 47+0+0
> >>>>> (3227325175 0 0) 0xf132bc0 con 0xee8a680
> >>>>> -22> 2014-08-13 17:52:56.324111 7f8a997a7700 1 --
> >>>>> 10.141.8.182:6840/64670 --> 10.141.8.182:0/15796 -- osd_ping(ping_reply
> >>>>> e220
> >>>>> stamp 2014-08-13 17:52:56.323092) v2 -- ?+0 0xf811a40 con 0xee8a680
> >>>>> -21> 2014-08-13 17:52:56.584461 7f8a997a7700 1 --
> >>>>> 10.141.8.182:6840/64670 <== osd.29 10.143.8.181:0/12142 47 ====
> >>>>> osd_ping(ping e220 stamp 2014-08-13 17:52:56.583010) v2 ==== 47+0+0
> >>>>> (3355887204 0 0) 0xf655940 con 0xee88b00
> >>>>> -20> 2014-08-13 17:52:56.584486 7f8a997a7700 1 --
> >>>>> 10.141.8.182:6840/64670 --> 10.143.8.181:0/12142 -- osd_ping(ping_reply
> >>>>> e220
> >>>>> stamp 2014-08-13 17:52:56.583010) v2 -- ?+0 0xf132bc0 con 0xee88b00
> >>>>> -19> 2014-08-13 17:52:56.584498 7f8a97fa4700 1 --
> >>>>> 10.143.8.182:6827/64670 <== osd.29 10.143.8.181:0/12142 47 ====
> >>>>> osd_ping(ping e220 stamp 2014-08-13 17:52:56.583010) v2 ==== 47+0+0
> >>>>> (3355887204 0 0) 0xf20e040 con 0xee886e0
> >>>>> -18> 2014-08-13 17:52:56.584526 7f8a97fa4700 1 --
> >>>>> 10.143.8.182:6827/64670 --> 10.143.8.181:0/12142 -- osd_ping(ping_reply
> >>>>> e220
> >>>>> stamp 2014-08-13 17:52:56.583010) v2 -- ?+0 0xf475940 con 0xee886e0
> >>>>> -17> 2014-08-13 17:52:56.594448 7f8a798c7700 1 --
> >>>>> 10.141.8.182:6839/64670 >> :/0 pipe(0xec15f00 sd=74 :6839 s=0 pgs=0
> >>>>> cs=0
> >>>>> l=0
> >>>>> c=0xee856a0).accept sd=74 10.141.8.180:47641/0
> >>>>> -16> 2014-08-13 17:52:56.594921 7f8a798c7700 1 --
> >>>>> 10.141.8.182:6839/64670 <== client.7512 10.141.8.180:0/1018433 1 ====
> >>>>> osd_op(client.7512.0:1 [pgls start_epoch 0] 3.0
> >>>>> ack+read+known_if_redirected e220) v4 ==== 151+0+39 (1972163119 0
> >>>>> 4174233976) 0xf3bca40 con 0xee856a0
> >>>>> -15> 2014-08-13 17:52:56.594957 7f8a798c7700 5 -- op tracker -- ,
> >>>>> seq:
> >>>>> 299, time: 2014-08-13 17:52:56.594874, event: header_read, op:
> >>>>> osd_op(client.7512.0:1 [pgls start_epoch 0] 3.0
> >>>>> ack+read+known_if_redirected e220)
> >>>>> -14> 2014-08-13 17:52:56.594970 7f8a798c7700 5 -- op tracker -- ,
> >>>>> seq:
> >>>>> 299, time: 2014-08-13 17:52:56.594880, event: throttled, op:
> >>>>> osd_op(client.7512.0:1 [pgls start_epoch 0] 3.0
> >>>>> ack+read+known_if_redirected e220)
> >>>>> -13> 2014-08-13 17:52:56.594978 7f8a798c7700 5 -- op tracker -- ,
> >>>>> seq:
> >>>>> 299, time: 2014-08-13 17:52:56.594917, event: all_read, op:
> >>>>> osd_op(client.7512.0:1 [pgls start_epoch 0] 3.0
> >>>>> ack+read+known_if_redirected e220)
> >>>>> -12> 2014-08-13 17:52:56.594986 7f8a798c7700 5 -- op tracker -- ,
> >>>>> seq:
> >>>>> 299, time: 0.000000, event: dispatched, op: osd_op(client.7512.0:1
> >>>>> [pgls
> >>>>> start_epoch 0] 3.0 ack+read+known_if_redirected e220)
> >>>>> -11> 2014-08-13 17:52:56.595127 7f8a90795700 5 -- op tracker -- ,
> >>>>> seq:
> >>>>> 299, time: 2014-08-13 17:52:56.595104, event: reached_pg, op:
> >>>>> osd_op(client.7512.0:1 [pgls start_epoch 0] 3.0
> >>>>> ack+read+known_if_redirected e220)
> >>>>> -10> 2014-08-13 17:52:56.595159 7f8a90795700 5 -- op tracker -- ,
> >>>>> seq:
> >>>>> 299, time: 2014-08-13 17:52:56.595153, event: started, op:
> >>>>> osd_op(client.7512.0:1 [pgls start_epoch 0] 3.0
> >>>>> ack+read+known_if_redirected e220)
> >>>>> -9> 2014-08-13 17:52:56.602179 7f8a90795700 1 --
> >>>>> 10.141.8.182:6839/64670 --> 10.141.8.180:0/1018433 -- osd_op_reply(1
> >>>>> [pgls
> >>>>> start_epoch 0] v164'30654 uv30654 ondisk = 0) v6 -- ?+0 0xec16180 con
> >>>>> 0xee856a0
> >>>>> -8> 2014-08-13 17:52:56.602211 7f8a90795700 5 -- op tracker -- ,
> >>>>> seq:
> >>>>> 299, time: 2014-08-13 17:52:56.602205, event: done, op:
> >>>>> osd_op(client.7512.0:1 [pgls start_epoch 0] 3.0
> >>>>> ack+read+known_if_redirected e220)
> >>>>> -7> 2014-08-13 17:52:56.614839 7f8a798c7700 1 --
> >>>>> 10.141.8.182:6839/64670 <== client.7512 10.141.8.180:0/1018433 2 ====
> >>>>> osd_op(client.7512.0:2 [pgls start_epoch 220] 3.0
> >>>>> ack+read+known_if_redirected e220) v4 ==== 151+0+89 (3460833343 0
> >>>>> 2600845095) 0xf3bcec0 con 0xee856a0
> >>>>> -6> 2014-08-13 17:52:56.614864 7f8a798c7700 5 -- op tracker -- ,
> >>>>> seq:
> >>>>> 300, time: 2014-08-13 17:52:56.614789, event: header_read, op:
> >>>>> osd_op(client.7512.0:2 [pgls start_epoch 220] 3.0
> >>>>> ack+read+known_if_redirected e220)
> >>>>> -5> 2014-08-13 17:52:56.614874 7f8a798c7700 5 -- op tracker -- ,
> >>>>> seq:
> >>>>> 300, time: 2014-08-13 17:52:56.614792, event: throttled, op:
> >>>>> osd_op(client.7512.0:2 [pgls start_epoch 220] 3.0
> >>>>> ack+read+known_if_redirected e220)
> >>>>> -4> 2014-08-13 17:52:56.614884 7f8a798c7700 5 -- op tracker -- ,
> >>>>> seq:
> >>>>> 300, time: 2014-08-13 17:52:56.614835, event: all_read, op:
> >>>>> osd_op(client.7512.0:2 [pgls start_epoch 220] 3.0
> >>>>> ack+read+known_if_redirected e220)
> >>>>> -3> 2014-08-13 17:52:56.614891 7f8a798c7700 5 -- op tracker -- ,
> >>>>> seq:
> >>>>> 300, time: 0.000000, event: dispatched, op: osd_op(client.7512.0:2
> >>>>> [pgls
> >>>>> start_epoch 220] 3.0 ack+read+known_if_redirected e220)
> >>>>> -2> 2014-08-13 17:52:56.614972 7f8a92f9a700 5 -- op tracker -- ,
> >>>>> seq:
> >>>>> 300, time: 2014-08-13 17:52:56.614958, event: reached_pg, op:
> >>>>> osd_op(client.7512.0:2 [pgls start_epoch 220] 3.0
> >>>>> ack+read+known_if_redirected e220)
> >>>>> -1> 2014-08-13 17:52:56.614993 7f8a92f9a700 5 -- op tracker -- ,
> >>>>> seq:
> >>>>> 300, time: 2014-08-13 17:52:56.614986, event: started, op:
> >>>>> osd_op(client.7512.0:2 [pgls start_epoch 220] 3.0
> >>>>> ack+read+known_if_redirected e220)
> >>>>> 0> 2014-08-13 17:52:56.617087 7f8a92f9a700 -1
> >>>>> os/GenericObjectMap.cc:
> >>>>> In function 'int GenericObjectMap::list_objects(const coll_t&,
> >>>>> ghobject_t,
> >>>>> int, std::vector<ghobject_t>*, ghobject_t*)' thread 7f8a92f9a700 time
> >>>>> 2014-08-13 17:52:56.615073
> >>>>> os/GenericObjectMap.cc: 1118: FAILED assert(start <= header.oid)
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>> ceph version 0.83 (78ff1f0a5dfd3c5850805b4021738564c36c92b8)
> >>>>> 1: (GenericObjectMap::list_objects(coll_t const&, ghobject_t, int,
> >>>>> std::vector<ghobject_t, std::allocator<ghobject_t> >*,
> >>>>> ghobject_t*)+0x474)
> >>>>> [0x98f774]
> >>>>> 2: (KeyValueStore::collection_list_partial(coll_t, ghobject_t, int,
> >>>>> int,
> >>>>> snapid_t, std::vector<ghobject_t, std::allocator<ghobject_t> >*,
> >>>>> ghobject_t*)+0x274) [0x8c5b54]
> >>>>> 3: (PGBackend::objects_list_partial(hobject_t const&, int, int,
> >>>>> snapid_t,
> >>>>> std::vector<hobject_t, std::allocator<hobject_t> >*, hobject_t*)+0x1c9)
> >>>>> [0x862de9]
> >>>>> 4: (ReplicatedPG::do_pg_op(std::tr1::shared_ptr<OpRequest>)+0xea5)
> >>>>> [0x7f67f5]
> >>>>> 5: (ReplicatedPG::do_op(std::tr1::shared_ptr<OpRequest>)+0x1f3)
> >>>>> [0x8177b3]
> >>>>> 6: (ReplicatedPG::do_request(std::tr1::shared_ptr<OpRequest>,
> >>>>> ThreadPool::TPHandle&)+0x5d5) [0x7b8045]
> >>>>> 7: (OSD::dequeue_op(boost::intrusive_ptr<PG>,
> >>>>> std::tr1::shared_ptr<OpRequest>, ThreadPool::TPHandle&)+0x47d)
> >>>>> [0x62bf8d]
> >>>>> 8: (OSD::ShardedOpWQ::_process(unsigned int,
> >>>>> ceph::heartbeat_handle_d*)+0x35c) [0x62c56c]
> >>>>> 9: (ShardedThreadPool::shardedthreadpool_worker(unsigned int)+0x8cd)
> >>>>> [0xa776fd]
> >>>>> 10: (ShardedThreadPool::WorkThreadSharded::entry()+0x10) [0xa79980]
> >>>>> 11: (()+0x7df3) [0x7f8aac71fdf3]
> >>>>> 12: (clone()+0x6d) [0x7f8aab1963dd]
> >>>>> NOTE: a copy of the executable, or `objdump -rdS <executable>` is
> >>>>> needed
> >>>>> to
> >>>>> interpret this.
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>> ceph version 0.83 (78ff1f0a5dfd3c5850805b4021738564c36c92b8)
> >>>>> 1: /usr/bin/ceph-osd() [0x99b466]
> >>>>> 2: (()+0xf130) [0x7f8aac727130]
> >>>>> 3: (gsignal()+0x39) [0x7f8aab0d5989]
> >>>>> 4: (abort()+0x148) [0x7f8aab0d7098]
> >>>>> 5: (__gnu_cxx::__verbose_terminate_handler()+0x165) [0x7f8aab9e89d5]
> >>>>> 6: (()+0x5e946) [0x7f8aab9e6946]
> >>>>> 7: (()+0x5e973) [0x7f8aab9e6973]
> >>>>> 8: (()+0x5eb9f) [0x7f8aab9e6b9f]
> >>>>> 9: (ceph::__ceph_assert_fail(char const*, char const*, int, char
> >>>>> const*)+0x1ef) [0xa8805f]
> >>>>> 10: (GenericObjectMap::list_objects(coll_t const&, ghobject_t, int,
> >>>>> std::vector<ghobject_t, std::allocator<ghobject_t> >*,
> >>>>> ghobject_t*)+0x474)
> >>>>> [0x98f774]
> >>>>> 11: (KeyValueStore::collection_list_partial(coll_t, ghobject_t, int,
> >>>>> int,
> >>>>> snapid_t, std::vector<ghobject_t, std::allocator<ghobject_t> >*,
> >>>>> ghobject_t*)+0x274) [0x8c5b54]
> >>>>> 12: (PGBackend::objects_list_partial(hobject_t const&, int, int,
> >>>>> snapid_t,
> >>>>> std::vector<hobject_t, std::allocator<hobject_t> >*, hobject_t*)+0x1c9)
> >>>>> [0x862de9]
> >>>>> 13: (ReplicatedPG::do_pg_op(std::tr1::shared_ptr<OpRequest>)+0xea5)
> >>>>> [0x7f67f5]
> >>>>> 14: (ReplicatedPG::do_op(std::tr1::shared_ptr<OpRequest>)+0x1f3)
> >>>>> [0x8177b3]
> >>>>> 15: (ReplicatedPG::do_request(std::tr1::shared_ptr<OpRequest>,
> >>>>> ThreadPool::TPHandle&)+0x5d5) [0x7b8045]
> >>>>> 16: (OSD::dequeue_op(boost::intrusive_ptr<PG>,
> >>>>> std::tr1::shared_ptr<OpRequest>, ThreadPool::TPHandle&)+0x47d)
> >>>>> [0x62bf8d]
> >>>>> 17: (OSD::ShardedOpWQ::_process(unsigned int,
> >>>>> ceph::heartbeat_handle_d*)+0x35c) [0x62c56c]
> >>>>> 18: (ShardedThreadPool::shardedthreadpool_worker(unsigned int)+0x8cd)
> >>>>> [0xa776fd]
> >>>>> 19: (ShardedThreadPool::WorkThreadSharded::entry()+0x10) [0xa79980]
> >>>>> 20: (()+0x7df3) [0x7f8aac71fdf3]
> >>>>> 21: (clone()+0x6d) [0x7f8aab1963dd]
> >>>>> NOTE: a copy of the executable, or `objdump -rdS <executable>` is
> >>>>> needed
> >>>>> to
> >>>>> interpret this.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> --- begin dump of recent events ---
> >>>>> 0> 2014-08-13 17:52:56.714214 7f8a92f9a700 -1 *** Caught signal
> >>>>> (Aborted) **
> >>>>> in thread 7f8a92f9a700
> >>>>>
> >>>>> ceph version 0.83 (78ff1f0a5dfd3c5850805b4021738564c36c92b8)
> >>>>> 1: /usr/bin/ceph-osd() [0x99b466]
> >>>>> 2: (()+0xf130) [0x7f8aac727130]
> >>>>> 3: (gsignal()+0x39) [0x7f8aab0d5989]
> >>>>> 4: (abort()+0x148) [0x7f8aab0d7098]
> >>>>> 5: (__gnu_cxx::__verbose_terminate_handler()+0x165) [0x7f8aab9e89d5]
> >>>>> 6: (()+0x5e946) [0x7f8aab9e6946]
> >>>>> 7: (()+0x5e973) [0x7f8aab9e6973]
> >>>>> 8: (()+0x5eb9f) [0x7f8aab9e6b9f]
> >>>>> 9: (ceph::__ceph_assert_fail(char const*, char const*, int, char
> >>>>> const*)+0x1ef) [0xa8805f]
> >>>>> 10: (GenericObjectMap::list_objects(coll_t const&, ghobject_t, int,
> >>>>> std::vector<ghobject_t, std::allocator<ghobject_t> >*,
> >>>>> ghobject_t*)+0x474)
> >>>>> [0x98f774]
> >>>>> 11: (KeyValueStore::collection_list_partial(coll_t, ghobject_t, int,
> >>>>> int,
> >>>>> snapid_t, std::vector<ghobject_t, std::allocator<ghobject_t> >*,
> >>>>> ghobject_t*)+0x274) [0x8c5b54]
> >>>>> 12: (PGBackend::objects_list_partial(hobject_t const&, int, int,
> >>>>> snapid_t,
> >>>>> std::vector<hobject_t, std::allocator<hobject_t> >*, hobject_t*)+0x1c9)
> >>>>> [0x862de9]
> >>>>> 13: (ReplicatedPG::do_pg_op(std::tr1::shared_ptr<OpRequest>)+0xea5)
> >>>>> [0x7f67f5]
> >>>>> 14: (ReplicatedPG::do_op(std::tr1::shared_ptr<OpRequest>)+0x1f3)
> >>>>> [0x8177b3]
> >>>>> 15: (ReplicatedPG::do_request(std::tr1::shared_ptr<OpRequest>,
> >>>>> ThreadPool::TPHandle&)+0x5d5) [0x7b8045]
> >>>>> 16: (OSD::dequeue_op(boost::intrusive_ptr<PG>,
> >>>>> std::tr1::shared_ptr<OpRequest>, ThreadPool::TPHandle&)+0x47d)
> >>>>> [0x62bf8d]
> >>>>> 17: (OSD::ShardedOpWQ::_process(unsigned int,
> >>>>> ceph::heartbeat_handle_d*)+0x35c) [0x62c56c]
> >>>>> 18: (ShardedThreadPool::shardedthreadpool_worker(unsigned int)+0x8cd)
> >>>>> [0xa776fd]
> >>>>> 19: (ShardedThreadPool::WorkThreadSharded::entry()+0x10) [0xa79980]
> >>>>> 20: (()+0x7df3) [0x7f8aac71fdf3]
> >>>>> 21: (clone()+0x6d) [0x7f8aab1963dd]
> >>>>> NOTE: a copy of the executable, or `objdump -rdS <executable>` is
> >>>>> needed
> >>>>> to
> >>>>> interpret this.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> I guess this has something to do with using the dev Keyvaluestore?
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Thanks!
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Kenneth
> >>>>>
> >>>>> _______________________________________________
> >>>>> ceph-users mailing list
> >>>>> ceph-users at lists.ceph.com
> >>>>> http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> --
> >>>> Best Regards,
> >>>>
> >>>> Wheat
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> ----- End message from Haomai Wang <haomaiwang at gmail.com> -----
> >>>
> >>> --
> >>>
> >>> Met vriendelijke groeten,
> >>> Kenneth Waegeman
> >>>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> --
> >> Best Regards,
> >>
> >> Wheat
> >
> >
> >
> > ----- End message from Haomai Wang <haomaiwang at gmail.com> -----
> >
> > --
> >
> > Met vriendelijke groeten,
> > Kenneth Waegeman
> >
>
>
>
> --
> Best Regards,
>
> Wheat
> _______________________________________________
> ceph-users mailing list
> ceph-users at lists.ceph.com
> http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com
>
>
