ceph cluster inconsistency?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



I have:
osd_objectstore = keyvaluestore-dev

in the global section of my ceph.conf


[root at ceph002 ~]# ceph osd erasure-code-profile get profile11
directory=/usr/lib64/ceph/erasure-code
k=8
m=3
plugin=jerasure
ruleset-failure-domain=osd
technique=reed_sol_van

the ecdata pool has this as profile

pool 3 'ecdata' erasure size 11 min_size 8 crush_ruleset 2 object_hash  
rjenkins pg_num 128 pgp_num 128 last_change 161 flags hashpspool  
stripe_width 4096

ECrule in crushmap

rule ecdata {
         ruleset 2
         type erasure
         min_size 3
         max_size 20
         step set_chooseleaf_tries 5
         step take default-ec
         step choose indep 0 type osd
         step emit
}
root default-ec {
         id -8           # do not change unnecessarily
         # weight 140.616
         alg straw
         hash 0  # rjenkins1
         item ceph001-ec weight 46.872
         item ceph002-ec weight 46.872
         item ceph003-ec weight 46.872
...

Cheers!
Kenneth

----- Message from Haomai Wang <haomaiwang at gmail.com> ---------
    Date: Thu, 14 Aug 2014 10:07:50 +0800
    From: Haomai Wang <haomaiwang at gmail.com>
Subject: Re: ceph cluster inconsistency?
      To: Kenneth Waegeman <Kenneth.Waegeman at ugent.be>
      Cc: ceph-users <ceph-users at lists.ceph.com>


> Hi Kenneth,
>
> Could you give your configuration related to EC and KeyValueStore?
> Not sure whether it's bug on KeyValueStore
>
> On Thu, Aug 14, 2014 at 12:06 AM, Kenneth Waegeman
> <Kenneth.Waegeman at ugent.be> wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I was doing some tests with rados bench on a Erasure Coded pool (using
>> keyvaluestore-dev objectstore) on 0.83, and I see some strangs things:
>>
>>
>> [root at ceph001 ~]# ceph status
>>     cluster 82766e04-585b-49a6-a0ac-c13d9ffd0a7d
>>      health HEALTH_WARN too few pgs per osd (4 < min 20)
>>      monmap e1: 3 mons at
>> {ceph001=10.141.8.180:6789/0,ceph002=10.141.8.181:6789/0,ceph003=10.141.8.182:6789/0},
>> election epoch 6, quorum 0,1,2 ceph001,ceph002,ceph003
>>      mdsmap e116: 1/1/1 up {0=ceph001.cubone.os=up:active}, 2 up:standby
>>      osdmap e292: 78 osds: 78 up, 78 in
>>       pgmap v48873: 320 pgs, 4 pools, 15366 GB data, 3841 kobjects
>>             1381 GB used, 129 TB / 131 TB avail
>>                  320 active+clean
>>
>> There is around 15T of data, but only 1.3 T usage.
>>
>> This is also visible in rados:
>>
>> [root at ceph001 ~]# rados df
>> pool name       category                 KB      objects       clones
>> degraded      unfound           rd        rd KB           wr        wr KB
>> data            -                          0            0            0
>> 0           0            0            0            0            0
>> ecdata          -                16113451009      3933959            0
>> 0           0            1            1      3935632  16116850711
>> metadata        -                          2           20            0
>> 0           0           33           36           21            8
>> rbd             -                          0            0            0
>> 0           0            0            0            0            0
>>   total used      1448266016      3933979
>>   total avail   139400181016
>>   total space   140848447032
>>
>>
>> Another (related?) thing: if I do rados -p ecdata ls, I trigger osd
>> shutdowns (each time):
>> I get a list followed by an error:
>>
>> ...
>> benchmark_data_ceph001.cubone.os_8961_object243839
>> benchmark_data_ceph001.cubone.os_5560_object801983
>> benchmark_data_ceph001.cubone.os_31461_object856489
>> benchmark_data_ceph001.cubone.os_8961_object202232
>> benchmark_data_ceph001.cubone.os_4919_object33199
>> benchmark_data_ceph001.cubone.os_5560_object807797
>> benchmark_data_ceph001.cubone.os_4919_object74729
>> benchmark_data_ceph001.cubone.os_31461_object1264121
>> benchmark_data_ceph001.cubone.os_5560_object1318513
>> benchmark_data_ceph001.cubone.os_5560_object1202111
>> benchmark_data_ceph001.cubone.os_31461_object939107
>> benchmark_data_ceph001.cubone.os_31461_object729682
>> benchmark_data_ceph001.cubone.os_5560_object122915
>> benchmark_data_ceph001.cubone.os_5560_object76521
>> benchmark_data_ceph001.cubone.os_5560_object113261
>> benchmark_data_ceph001.cubone.os_31461_object575079
>> benchmark_data_ceph001.cubone.os_5560_object671042
>> benchmark_data_ceph001.cubone.os_5560_object381146
>> 2014-08-13 17:57:48.736150 7f65047b5700  0 -- 10.141.8.180:0/1023295 >>
>> 10.141.8.182:6839/4471 pipe(0x7f64fc019b20 sd=5 :0 s=1 pgs=0 cs=0 l=1
>> c=0x7f64fc019db0).fault
>>
>> And I can see this in the log files:
>>
>>    -25> 2014-08-13 17:52:56.323908 7f8a97fa4700  1 --
>> 10.143.8.182:6827/64670 <== osd.57 10.141.8.182:0/15796 51 ====
>> osd_ping(ping e220 stamp 2014-08-13 17:52:56.323092) v2 ==== 47+0+0
>> (3227325175 0 0) 0xf475940 con 0xee89fa0
>>    -24> 2014-08-13 17:52:56.323938 7f8a97fa4700  1 --
>> 10.143.8.182:6827/64670 --> 10.141.8.182:0/15796 -- osd_ping(ping_reply e220
>> stamp 2014-08-13 17:52:56.323092) v2 -- ?+0 0xf815b00 con 0xee89fa0
>>    -23> 2014-08-13 17:52:56.324078 7f8a997a7700  1 --
>> 10.141.8.182:6840/64670 <== osd.57 10.141.8.182:0/15796 51 ====
>> osd_ping(ping e220 stamp 2014-08-13 17:52:56.323092) v2 ==== 47+0+0
>> (3227325175 0 0) 0xf132bc0 con 0xee8a680
>>    -22> 2014-08-13 17:52:56.324111 7f8a997a7700  1 --
>> 10.141.8.182:6840/64670 --> 10.141.8.182:0/15796 -- osd_ping(ping_reply e220
>> stamp 2014-08-13 17:52:56.323092) v2 -- ?+0 0xf811a40 con 0xee8a680
>>    -21> 2014-08-13 17:52:56.584461 7f8a997a7700  1 --
>> 10.141.8.182:6840/64670 <== osd.29 10.143.8.181:0/12142 47 ====
>> osd_ping(ping e220 stamp 2014-08-13 17:52:56.583010) v2 ==== 47+0+0
>> (3355887204 0 0) 0xf655940 con 0xee88b00
>>    -20> 2014-08-13 17:52:56.584486 7f8a997a7700  1 --
>> 10.141.8.182:6840/64670 --> 10.143.8.181:0/12142 -- osd_ping(ping_reply e220
>> stamp 2014-08-13 17:52:56.583010) v2 -- ?+0 0xf132bc0 con 0xee88b00
>>    -19> 2014-08-13 17:52:56.584498 7f8a97fa4700  1 --
>> 10.143.8.182:6827/64670 <== osd.29 10.143.8.181:0/12142 47 ====
>> osd_ping(ping e220 stamp 2014-08-13 17:52:56.583010) v2 ==== 47+0+0
>> (3355887204 0 0) 0xf20e040 con 0xee886e0
>>    -18> 2014-08-13 17:52:56.584526 7f8a97fa4700  1 --
>> 10.143.8.182:6827/64670 --> 10.143.8.181:0/12142 -- osd_ping(ping_reply e220
>> stamp 2014-08-13 17:52:56.583010) v2 -- ?+0 0xf475940 con 0xee886e0
>>    -17> 2014-08-13 17:52:56.594448 7f8a798c7700  1 --
>> 10.141.8.182:6839/64670 >> :/0 pipe(0xec15f00 sd=74 :6839 s=0 pgs=0 cs=0 l=0
>> c=0xee856a0).accept sd=74 10.141.8.180:47641/0
>>    -16> 2014-08-13 17:52:56.594921 7f8a798c7700  1 --
>> 10.141.8.182:6839/64670 <== client.7512 10.141.8.180:0/1018433 1 ====
>> osd_op(client.7512.0:1  [pgls start_epoch 0] 3.0
>> ack+read+known_if_redirected e220) v4 ==== 151+0+39 (1972163119 0
>> 4174233976) 0xf3bca40 con 0xee856a0
>>    -15> 2014-08-13 17:52:56.594957 7f8a798c7700  5 -- op tracker -- , seq:
>> 299, time: 2014-08-13 17:52:56.594874, event: header_read, op:
>> osd_op(client.7512.0:1  [pgls start_epoch 0] 3.0
>> ack+read+known_if_redirected e220)
>>    -14> 2014-08-13 17:52:56.594970 7f8a798c7700  5 -- op tracker -- , seq:
>> 299, time: 2014-08-13 17:52:56.594880, event: throttled, op:
>> osd_op(client.7512.0:1  [pgls start_epoch 0] 3.0
>> ack+read+known_if_redirected e220)
>>    -13> 2014-08-13 17:52:56.594978 7f8a798c7700  5 -- op tracker -- , seq:
>> 299, time: 2014-08-13 17:52:56.594917, event: all_read, op:
>> osd_op(client.7512.0:1  [pgls start_epoch 0] 3.0
>> ack+read+known_if_redirected e220)
>>    -12> 2014-08-13 17:52:56.594986 7f8a798c7700  5 -- op tracker -- , seq:
>> 299, time: 0.000000, event: dispatched, op: osd_op(client.7512.0:1  [pgls
>> start_epoch 0] 3.0 ack+read+known_if_redirected e220)
>>    -11> 2014-08-13 17:52:56.595127 7f8a90795700  5 -- op tracker -- , seq:
>> 299, time: 2014-08-13 17:52:56.595104, event: reached_pg, op:
>> osd_op(client.7512.0:1  [pgls start_epoch 0] 3.0
>> ack+read+known_if_redirected e220)
>>    -10> 2014-08-13 17:52:56.595159 7f8a90795700  5 -- op tracker -- , seq:
>> 299, time: 2014-08-13 17:52:56.595153, event: started, op:
>> osd_op(client.7512.0:1  [pgls start_epoch 0] 3.0
>> ack+read+known_if_redirected e220)
>>     -9> 2014-08-13 17:52:56.602179 7f8a90795700  1 --
>> 10.141.8.182:6839/64670 --> 10.141.8.180:0/1018433 -- osd_op_reply(1  [pgls
>> start_epoch 0] v164'30654 uv30654 ondisk = 0) v6 -- ?+0 0xec16180 con
>> 0xee856a0
>>     -8> 2014-08-13 17:52:56.602211 7f8a90795700  5 -- op tracker -- , seq:
>> 299, time: 2014-08-13 17:52:56.602205, event: done, op:
>> osd_op(client.7512.0:1  [pgls start_epoch 0] 3.0
>> ack+read+known_if_redirected e220)
>>     -7> 2014-08-13 17:52:56.614839 7f8a798c7700  1 --
>> 10.141.8.182:6839/64670 <== client.7512 10.141.8.180:0/1018433 2 ====
>> osd_op(client.7512.0:2  [pgls start_epoch 220] 3.0
>> ack+read+known_if_redirected e220) v4 ==== 151+0+89 (3460833343 0
>> 2600845095) 0xf3bcec0 con 0xee856a0
>>     -6> 2014-08-13 17:52:56.614864 7f8a798c7700  5 -- op tracker -- , seq:
>> 300, time: 2014-08-13 17:52:56.614789, event: header_read, op:
>> osd_op(client.7512.0:2  [pgls start_epoch 220] 3.0
>> ack+read+known_if_redirected e220)
>>     -5> 2014-08-13 17:52:56.614874 7f8a798c7700  5 -- op tracker -- , seq:
>> 300, time: 2014-08-13 17:52:56.614792, event: throttled, op:
>> osd_op(client.7512.0:2  [pgls start_epoch 220] 3.0
>> ack+read+known_if_redirected e220)
>>     -4> 2014-08-13 17:52:56.614884 7f8a798c7700  5 -- op tracker -- , seq:
>> 300, time: 2014-08-13 17:52:56.614835, event: all_read, op:
>> osd_op(client.7512.0:2  [pgls start_epoch 220] 3.0
>> ack+read+known_if_redirected e220)
>>     -3> 2014-08-13 17:52:56.614891 7f8a798c7700  5 -- op tracker -- , seq:
>> 300, time: 0.000000, event: dispatched, op: osd_op(client.7512.0:2  [pgls
>> start_epoch 220] 3.0 ack+read+known_if_redirected e220)
>>     -2> 2014-08-13 17:52:56.614972 7f8a92f9a700  5 -- op tracker -- , seq:
>> 300, time: 2014-08-13 17:52:56.614958, event: reached_pg, op:
>> osd_op(client.7512.0:2  [pgls start_epoch 220] 3.0
>> ack+read+known_if_redirected e220)
>>     -1> 2014-08-13 17:52:56.614993 7f8a92f9a700  5 -- op tracker -- , seq:
>> 300, time: 2014-08-13 17:52:56.614986, event: started, op:
>> osd_op(client.7512.0:2  [pgls start_epoch 220] 3.0
>> ack+read+known_if_redirected e220)
>>      0> 2014-08-13 17:52:56.617087 7f8a92f9a700 -1 os/GenericObjectMap.cc:
>> In function 'int GenericObjectMap::list_objects(const coll_t&, ghobject_t,
>> int, std::vector<ghobject_t>*, ghobject_t*)' thread 7f8a92f9a700 time
>> 2014-08-13 17:52:56.615073
>> os/GenericObjectMap.cc: 1118: FAILED assert(start <= header.oid)
>>
>>
>>  ceph version 0.83 (78ff1f0a5dfd3c5850805b4021738564c36c92b8)
>>  1: (GenericObjectMap::list_objects(coll_t const&, ghobject_t, int,
>> std::vector<ghobject_t, std::allocator<ghobject_t> >*, ghobject_t*)+0x474)
>> [0x98f774]
>>  2: (KeyValueStore::collection_list_partial(coll_t, ghobject_t, int, int,
>> snapid_t, std::vector<ghobject_t, std::allocator<ghobject_t> >*,
>> ghobject_t*)+0x274) [0x8c5b54]
>>  3: (PGBackend::objects_list_partial(hobject_t const&, int, int, snapid_t,
>> std::vector<hobject_t, std::allocator<hobject_t> >*, hobject_t*)+0x1c9)
>> [0x862de9]
>>  4: (ReplicatedPG::do_pg_op(std::tr1::shared_ptr<OpRequest>)+0xea5)
>> [0x7f67f5]
>>  5: (ReplicatedPG::do_op(std::tr1::shared_ptr<OpRequest>)+0x1f3) [0x8177b3]
>>  6: (ReplicatedPG::do_request(std::tr1::shared_ptr<OpRequest>,
>> ThreadPool::TPHandle&)+0x5d5) [0x7b8045]
>>  7: (OSD::dequeue_op(boost::intrusive_ptr<PG>,
>> std::tr1::shared_ptr<OpRequest>, ThreadPool::TPHandle&)+0x47d) [0x62bf8d]
>>  8: (OSD::ShardedOpWQ::_process(unsigned int,
>> ceph::heartbeat_handle_d*)+0x35c) [0x62c56c]
>>  9: (ShardedThreadPool::shardedthreadpool_worker(unsigned int)+0x8cd)
>> [0xa776fd]
>>  10: (ShardedThreadPool::WorkThreadSharded::entry()+0x10) [0xa79980]
>>  11: (()+0x7df3) [0x7f8aac71fdf3]
>>  12: (clone()+0x6d) [0x7f8aab1963dd]
>>  NOTE: a copy of the executable, or `objdump -rdS <executable>` is needed to
>> interpret this.
>>
>>
>>  ceph version 0.83 (78ff1f0a5dfd3c5850805b4021738564c36c92b8)
>>  1: /usr/bin/ceph-osd() [0x99b466]
>>  2: (()+0xf130) [0x7f8aac727130]
>>  3: (gsignal()+0x39) [0x7f8aab0d5989]
>>  4: (abort()+0x148) [0x7f8aab0d7098]
>>  5: (__gnu_cxx::__verbose_terminate_handler()+0x165) [0x7f8aab9e89d5]
>>  6: (()+0x5e946) [0x7f8aab9e6946]
>>  7: (()+0x5e973) [0x7f8aab9e6973]
>>  8: (()+0x5eb9f) [0x7f8aab9e6b9f]
>>  9: (ceph::__ceph_assert_fail(char const*, char const*, int, char
>> const*)+0x1ef) [0xa8805f]
>>  10: (GenericObjectMap::list_objects(coll_t const&, ghobject_t, int,
>> std::vector<ghobject_t, std::allocator<ghobject_t> >*, ghobject_t*)+0x474)
>> [0x98f774]
>>  11: (KeyValueStore::collection_list_partial(coll_t, ghobject_t, int, int,
>> snapid_t, std::vector<ghobject_t, std::allocator<ghobject_t> >*,
>> ghobject_t*)+0x274) [0x8c5b54]
>>  12: (PGBackend::objects_list_partial(hobject_t const&, int, int, snapid_t,
>> std::vector<hobject_t, std::allocator<hobject_t> >*, hobject_t*)+0x1c9)
>> [0x862de9]
>>  13: (ReplicatedPG::do_pg_op(std::tr1::shared_ptr<OpRequest>)+0xea5)
>> [0x7f67f5]
>>  14: (ReplicatedPG::do_op(std::tr1::shared_ptr<OpRequest>)+0x1f3) [0x8177b3]
>>  15: (ReplicatedPG::do_request(std::tr1::shared_ptr<OpRequest>,
>> ThreadPool::TPHandle&)+0x5d5) [0x7b8045]
>>  16: (OSD::dequeue_op(boost::intrusive_ptr<PG>,
>> std::tr1::shared_ptr<OpRequest>, ThreadPool::TPHandle&)+0x47d) [0x62bf8d]
>>  17: (OSD::ShardedOpWQ::_process(unsigned int,
>> ceph::heartbeat_handle_d*)+0x35c) [0x62c56c]
>>  18: (ShardedThreadPool::shardedthreadpool_worker(unsigned int)+0x8cd)
>> [0xa776fd]
>>  19: (ShardedThreadPool::WorkThreadSharded::entry()+0x10) [0xa79980]
>>  20: (()+0x7df3) [0x7f8aac71fdf3]
>>  21: (clone()+0x6d) [0x7f8aab1963dd]
>>  NOTE: a copy of the executable, or `objdump -rdS <executable>` is needed to
>> interpret this.
>>
>> --- begin dump of recent events ---
>>      0> 2014-08-13 17:52:56.714214 7f8a92f9a700 -1 *** Caught signal
>> (Aborted) **
>>  in thread 7f8a92f9a700
>>
>>  ceph version 0.83 (78ff1f0a5dfd3c5850805b4021738564c36c92b8)
>>  1: /usr/bin/ceph-osd() [0x99b466]
>>  2: (()+0xf130) [0x7f8aac727130]
>>  3: (gsignal()+0x39) [0x7f8aab0d5989]
>>  4: (abort()+0x148) [0x7f8aab0d7098]
>>  5: (__gnu_cxx::__verbose_terminate_handler()+0x165) [0x7f8aab9e89d5]
>>  6: (()+0x5e946) [0x7f8aab9e6946]
>>  7: (()+0x5e973) [0x7f8aab9e6973]
>>  8: (()+0x5eb9f) [0x7f8aab9e6b9f]
>>  9: (ceph::__ceph_assert_fail(char const*, char const*, int, char
>> const*)+0x1ef) [0xa8805f]
>>  10: (GenericObjectMap::list_objects(coll_t const&, ghobject_t, int,
>> std::vector<ghobject_t, std::allocator<ghobject_t> >*, ghobject_t*)+0x474)
>> [0x98f774]
>>  11: (KeyValueStore::collection_list_partial(coll_t, ghobject_t, int, int,
>> snapid_t, std::vector<ghobject_t, std::allocator<ghobject_t> >*,
>> ghobject_t*)+0x274) [0x8c5b54]
>>  12: (PGBackend::objects_list_partial(hobject_t const&, int, int, snapid_t,
>> std::vector<hobject_t, std::allocator<hobject_t> >*, hobject_t*)+0x1c9)
>> [0x862de9]
>>  13: (ReplicatedPG::do_pg_op(std::tr1::shared_ptr<OpRequest>)+0xea5)
>> [0x7f67f5]
>>  14: (ReplicatedPG::do_op(std::tr1::shared_ptr<OpRequest>)+0x1f3) [0x8177b3]
>>  15: (ReplicatedPG::do_request(std::tr1::shared_ptr<OpRequest>,
>> ThreadPool::TPHandle&)+0x5d5) [0x7b8045]
>>  16: (OSD::dequeue_op(boost::intrusive_ptr<PG>,
>> std::tr1::shared_ptr<OpRequest>, ThreadPool::TPHandle&)+0x47d) [0x62bf8d]
>>  17: (OSD::ShardedOpWQ::_process(unsigned int,
>> ceph::heartbeat_handle_d*)+0x35c) [0x62c56c]
>>  18: (ShardedThreadPool::shardedthreadpool_worker(unsigned int)+0x8cd)
>> [0xa776fd]
>>  19: (ShardedThreadPool::WorkThreadSharded::entry()+0x10) [0xa79980]
>>  20: (()+0x7df3) [0x7f8aac71fdf3]
>>  21: (clone()+0x6d) [0x7f8aab1963dd]
>>  NOTE: a copy of the executable, or `objdump -rdS <executable>` is needed to
>> interpret this.
>>
>> I guess this has something to do with using the dev Keyvaluestore?
>>
>>
>> Thanks!
>>
>> Kenneth
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> ceph-users mailing list
>> ceph-users at lists.ceph.com
>> http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com
>
>
>
> --
> Best Regards,
>
> Wheat


----- End message from Haomai Wang <haomaiwang at gmail.com> -----

-- 

Met vriendelijke groeten,
Kenneth Waegeman



[Index of Archives]     [Information on CEPH]     [Linux Filesystem Development]     [Ceph Development]     [Ceph Large]     [Ceph Dev]     [Linux USB Development]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [xfs]


  Powered by Linux