Hi guys. Has anyone managed to get radosgw+tengine work with horizon+nginx? I'm experiencing problems with this installation, more info here: http://www.mail-archive.com/openstack at lists.openstack.org/msg07934.html 2014-07-04 15:05 GMT+03:00 Andrei Mikhailovsky <andrei at arhont.com>: > Hi David, > > Do you mind sharing the howto/documentation with examples of configs, etc.? > > I am tempted to give it a go and replace the Apache reverse proxy that I > am currently using. > > cheers > > Andrei > > ------------------------------ > *From: *"David Moreau Simard" <dmsimard at iweb.com> > *To: *ceph-users at lists.ceph.com > *Sent: *Sunday, 22 June, 2014 2:37:00 AM > *Subject: *Re: [ceph-users] nginx (tengine) and radosgw > > > Hi, > > I just wanted to chime in and say that I didn?t notice any problems > swapping nginx out in favor of tengine. > tengine is used as a load balancer that also handles SSL termination. > > I found that disabling body buffering saves a lot on upload times as > well. > > I took the time to do a post about it and linked this thread: > > http://dmsimard.com/2014/06/21/a-use-case-of-tengine-a-drop-in-replacement-and-fork-of-nginx/ > > - David > > On May 29, 2014, at 12:20 PM, Michael Lukzak <miszko at vp.pl> wrote: > > Hi, > > Ups, so I don't read carefully a doc... > I will try this solution. > > Thanks! > > Michael > > > From the docs, you need this setting in ceph.conf (if you're using > nginx/tengine): > > rgw print continue = false > > This will fix the 100-continue issues. > > On 5/29/2014 5:56 AM, Michael Lukzak wrote: > Re[2]: [ceph-users] nginx (tengine) and radosgw Hi, > > I'm also use tengine, works fine with SSL (I have a Wildcard). > But I have other issue with HTTP 100-Continue. > Clients like boto or Cyberduck hangs if they can't make HTTP 100-Continue. > > IP_REMOVED - - [29/May/2014:11:27:53 +0000] "PUT > /temp/1b6f6a11d7aa188f06f8255fdf0345b4 HTTP/1.1" 100 0 "-" "Boto/2.27.0 > Python/2.7.6 Linux/3.13.0-24-generic" > > Do You have also problem with that? > I used for testing oryginal nginx and also have a problem with > 100-Continue. > Only Apache 2.x works fine. > > BR, > Michael > > > > I haven't tried SSL yet. We currently don't have a wildcard certificate > for this, so it hasn't been a concern (and our current use case, all the > files are public anyway). > > On 5/20/2014 4:26 PM, Andrei Mikhailovsky wrote: > > > That looks very interesting indeed. I've tried to use nginx, but from what > I recall it had some ssl related issues. Have you tried to make the ssl > work so that nginx acts as an ssl proxy in front of the radosgw? > > Cheers > > Andrei > > ------------------------------ > *From: *"Brian Rak" <brak at gameservers.com> <brak at gameservers.com> > *To: *ceph-users at lists.ceph.com > *Sent: *Tuesday, 20 May, 2014 9:11:58 PM > *Subject: *[ceph-users] nginx (tengine) and radosgw > > I've just finished converting from nginx/radosgw to tengine/radosgw, and > it's fixed all the weird issues I was seeing (uploads failing, random > clock skew errors, timeouts). > > The problem with nginx and radosgw is that nginx insists on buffering > all the uploads to disk. This causes a significant performance hit, and > prevents larger uploads from working. Supposedly, there is going to be > an option in nginx to disable this, but it hasn't been released yet (nor > do I see anything on the nginx devel list about it). > > tengine ( http://tengine.taobao.org/ ) is an nginx fork that implements > unbuffered uploads to fastcgi. It's basically a drop in replacement for > nginx. > > My configuration looks like this: > > server { > listen 80; > > server_name *.rados.test rados.test; > > client_max_body_size 10g; > # This is the important option that tengine has, but nginx does not > fastcgi_request_buffering off; > > location / { > fastcgi_pass_header Authorization; > fastcgi_pass_request_headers on; > > if ($request_method = PUT ) { > rewrite ^ /PUT$request_uri; > } > include fastcgi_params; > > fastcgi_pass unix:/path/to/ceph.radosgw.fastcgi.sock; > } > > location /PUT/ { > internal; > fastcgi_pass_header Authorization; > fastcgi_pass_request_headers on; > > include fastcgi_params; > fastcgi_param CONTENT_LENGTH $content_length; > > fastcgi_pass unix:/path/to/ceph.radosgw.fastcgi.sock; > } > } > > > if anyone else is looking to run radosgw without having to run apache, I > would recommend you look into tengine :) > _______________________________________________ > ceph-users mailing list > ceph-users at lists.ceph.com > http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > ceph-users mailing list > ceph-users at lists.ceph.com > http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com > > _______________________________________________ > ceph-users mailing list > ceph-users at lists.ceph.com > http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com > > > > _______________________________________________ > ceph-users mailing list > ceph-users at lists.ceph.com > http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com > > > _______________________________________________ > ceph-users mailing list > ceph-users at lists.ceph.com > http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com > > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.ceph.com/pipermail/ceph-users-ceph.com/attachments/20140707/22426602/attachment.htm>
 |