Designing a cluster with ceph and benchmark (ceph vs ext4)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



What come first in my mind is GlusterFS, just my 2 cents.

Cheers

Le 23/05/2014 20:41, Listas at Adminlinux a ?crit :
> Hi !
>
> I have failover clusters for some aplications. Generally with 2
> members configured with Ubuntu + Drbd + Ext4. For example, my IMAP
> cluster works fine with ~ 50k email accounts and my HTTP cluster hosts
> ~2k sites.
>
> See design here: http://adminlinux.com.br/cluster_design.txt
>
> I would like to provide load balancing instead of just failover. So, I
> would like to use a distributed architecture of the filesystem. As we
> know, Ext4 isn't a distributed filesystem. So wish to use Ceph in my
> clusters.
>
> Any suggestions for design of the cluster with Ubuntu+Ceph?
>
> I built a simple cluster of 2 servers to test simultaneous reading and
> writing with Ceph. My conf:  http://adminlinux.com.br/ceph_conf.txt
>
> But in my simultaneous benchmarks found errors in reading and writing.
> I ran "iozone -t 5 -r 4k -s 2m" simultaneously on both servers in the
> cluster. The performance was poor and had errors like this:
>
> Error in file: Found ?0? Expecting ?6d6d6d6d6d6d6d6d? addr b6600000
> Error in file: Position 1060864
> Record # 259 Record size 4 kb
> where b6600000 loop 0
>
> Performance graphs of benchmark: http://adminlinux.com.br/ceph_bench.html
>
> Can you help me find what I did wrong?
>
> Thanks !
>

-- 
C?dric



[Index of Archives]     [Information on CEPH]     [Linux Filesystem Development]     [Ceph Development]     [Ceph Large]     [Ceph Dev]     [Linux USB Development]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [xfs]


  Powered by Linux