On 14.05.2014 17:26, Wido den Hollander wrote: > On 05/14/2014 05:24 PM, Georg H?llrigl wrote: >> Hello List, >> >> I see a pool without a name: >> >> ceph> osd lspools >> 0 data,1 metadata,2 rbd,3 .rgw.root,4 .rgw.control,5 .rgw,6 .rgw.gc,7 >> .users.uid,8 openstack-images,9 openstack-volumes,10 >> openstack-backups,11 .users,12 .users.swift,13 .users.email,14 .log,15 >> .rgw.buckets,16 .rgw.buckets.index,17 .usage,18 .intent-log,20 , >> >> I've already deleted one of those (with ID 19) with >> >> rados rmpool "" "" --yes-i-really-really-mean-it >> >> But now it's back with ID 20. >> >> Where do they come from? What kind of data is in there? >> > > You are running Dumpling 0.67.X with the RGW? It's something which is > caused by the RGW. No, the cluster is in the latest firefly release 0.80.1 I only found your entries from November 2013 - that's how I know how to delete the entry. http://lists.ceph.com/pipermail/ceph-users-ceph.com/2013-November/005737.html I found the discussion https://www.mail-archive.com/ceph-users at lists.ceph.com/msg08975.html - but the only info I see, that the empty named pool comes from rados. So maybe it's a bug somewhere in radosgw? I think pools should have names :) > > There is a thread on this list from two weeks ago about this. > >> >> Kind Regards, >> Georg >> _______________________________________________ >> ceph-users mailing list >> ceph-users at lists.ceph.com >> http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com
 |