I was in a similar situation where I could see the PGs data on an osd, but there was nothing I could do to force the pg to use that osd's copy. I ended up using the rbd_restore tool to create my rbd on disk and then I reimported it into the pool. See this thread for info on rbd_restore: http://www.spinics.net/lists/ceph-devel/msg11552.html Of course, you have to copy all of the pieces of the rbd image on one file system somewhere (thank goodness for thin provisioning!) for the tool to work. There really should be a better way. Jake On Monday, May 5, 2014, Jeff Bachtel <jbachtel at bericotechnologies.com> wrote: > Well, that'd be the ideal solution. Please check out the github gist I > posted, though. It seems that despite osd.4 having nothing good for pg > 0.2f, the cluster does not acknowledge any other osd has a copy of the pg. > I've tried downing osd.4 and manually deleting the pg directory in question > with the hope that the cluster would roll back epochs for 0.2f, but all it > does is recreate the pg directory (empty) on osd.4. > > Jeff > > On 05/05/2014 04:33 PM, Gregory Farnum wrote: > >> What's your cluster look like? I wonder if you can just remove the bad >> PG from osd.4 and let it recover from the existing osd.1 >> -Greg >> Software Engineer #42 @ http://inktank.com | http://ceph.com >> >> >> On Sat, May 3, 2014 at 9:17 AM, Jeff Bachtel >> <jbachtel at bericotechnologies.com> wrote: >> >>> This is all on firefly rc1 on CentOS 6 >>> >>> I had an osd getting overfull, and misinterpreting directions I downed it >>> then manually removed pg directories from the osd mount. On restart and >>> after a good deal of rebalancing (setting osd weights as I should've >>> originally), I'm now at >>> >>> cluster de10594a-0737-4f34-a926-58dc9254f95f >>> health HEALTH_WARN 2 pgs backfill; 1 pgs incomplete; 1 pgs stuck >>> inactive; 308 pgs stuck unclean; recov >>> ery 1/2420563 objects degraded (0.000%); noout flag(s) set >>> monmap e7: 3 mons at >>> {controller1=10.100.2.1:6789/0,controller2=10.100.2.2:6789/ >>> 0,controller3=10.100.2. >>> 3:6789/0}, election epoch 556, quorum 0,1,2 >>> controller1,controller2,controller3 >>> mdsmap e268: 1/1/1 up {0=controller1=up:active} >>> osdmap e3492: 5 osds: 5 up, 5 in >>> flags noout >>> pgmap v4167420: 320 pgs, 15 pools, 4811 GB data, 1181 kobjects >>> 9770 GB used, 5884 GB / 15654 GB avail >>> 1/2420563 objects degraded (0.000%) >>> 3 active >>> 12 active+clean >>> 2 active+remapped+wait_backfill >>> 1 incomplete >>> 302 active+remapped >>> client io 364 B/s wr, 0 op/s >>> >>> # ceph pg dump | grep 0.2f >>> dumped all in format plain >>> 0.2f 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 incomplete >>> 2014-05-03 11:38:01.526832 0'0 3492:23 [4] 4 [4] 4 >>> 2254'20053 2014-04-28 00:24:36.504086 2100'18109 2014-04-26 >>> 22:26:23.699330 >>> >>> # ceph pg map 0.2f >>> osdmap e3492 pg 0.2f (0.2f) -> up [4] acting [4] >>> >>> The pg query for the downed pg is at >>> https://gist.github.com/jeffb-bt/c8730899ff002070b325 >>> >>> Of course, the osd I manually mucked with is the only one the cluster is >>> picking up as up/acting. Now, I can query the pg and find epochs where >>> other >>> osds (that I didn't jack up) were acting. And in fact, the latest of >>> those >>> entries (osd.1) has the pg directory in its osd mount, and it's a good >>> healthy 59gb. >>> >>> I've tried manually rsync'ing (and preserving attributes) that set of >>> directories from osd.1 to osd.4 without success. Likewise I've tried >>> copying >>> the directories over without attributes set. I've done many, many deep >>> scrubs but the pg query does not show the scrub timestamps being >>> affected. >>> >>> I'm seeking ideas for either fixing metadata on the directory on osd.4 to >>> cause this pg to be seen/recognized, or ideas on forcing the cluster's pg >>> map to point to osd.1 for the incomplete pg (basically wiping out the >>> cluster's memory that osd.4 ever had 0.2f). Or any other solution :) It's >>> only 59g, so worst case I'll mark it lost and recreate the pg, but I'd >>> prefer to learn enough of the innards to understand what is going on, and >>> possible means of fixing it. >>> >>> Thanks for any help, >>> >>> Jeff >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> ceph-users mailing list >>> ceph-users at lists.ceph.com >>> http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com >>> >> > _______________________________________________ > ceph-users mailing list > ceph-users at lists.ceph.com > http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.ceph.com/pipermail/ceph-users-ceph.com/attachments/20140505/29e0d3ec/attachment.htm>
 |