Re: OSD port usage

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



I agree but somehow this generates more traffic too. We just need to find a good balance.
But I don’t think this will change the scenario where the cluster network is down and OSDs die because of this…

–––– 
Sébastien Han 
Cloud Engineer 

"Always give 100%. Unless you're giving blood.” 

Phone: +33 (0)1 49 70 99 72 
Mail: sebastien.han@xxxxxxxxxxxx 
Address : 10, rue de la Victoire - 75009 Paris 
Web : www.enovance.com - Twitter : @enovance 

On 24 Jan 2014, at 11:52, Sylvain Munaut <s.munaut@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> Hi,
> 
>> At some point (if the cluster gets big enough), could this degrade the network performance? Will it make sense to have a separate network for this?
>> 
>> So in addition to public and storage we will have an heartbeat network, so we could pin it to a specific network link.
> 
> I think the whole point of having added hearbeating on public &
> cluster network is to be able to detect failure of one network but not
> the other. Separating heartbeat on it's own independent network would
> be quite counter productive in this respect.
> 
> 
> Cheers,
> 
>   Sylvain

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail

_______________________________________________
ceph-users mailing list
ceph-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com

[Index of Archives]     [Information on CEPH]     [Linux Filesystem Development]     [Ceph Development]     [Ceph Large]     [Ceph Dev]     [Linux USB Development]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [xfs]


  Powered by Linux