Re: snapshot atomicity

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 




On 1/3/14, 3:21 AM, "Josh Durgin" <josh.durgin@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

>On 01/02/2014 10:51 PM, James Harper wrote:
>> I've not used ceph snapshots before. The documentation says that the
>>rbd device should not be in use before creating a snapshot. Does this
>>mean that creating a snapshot is not an atomic operation? I'm happy with
>>a crash consistent filesystem if that's all the warning is about.
>
>It's atomic, the warning is just that it's crash consistent, not
>application-level consistent.
>
>> If it is atomic, can you create multiple snapshots as an atomic
>>operation? The use case for this would be a database spread across
>>multiple volumes, eg database on one rbd, logfiles on another.
>
>No, but now that you mention it this would be technically pretty
>simple to implement. If multiple rbds referred to the same place to get
>their snapshot context, they could all be snapshotted atomically.
>
>Josh
>_______________________________________________

I had been trying to imagine a use for pool-level snapshotting after I¹d
read about that feature.  Thanks for settling that!

JL

_______________________________________________
ceph-users mailing list
ceph-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com





[Index of Archives]     [Information on CEPH]     [Linux Filesystem Development]     [Ceph Development]     [Ceph Large]     [Linux USB Development]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [xfs]


  Powered by Linux