Re: After reboot nothing worked

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Thanks Joao for information.

Many Thanks
Karan Singh 


----- Original Message -----
From: "Joao Eduardo Luis" <joao.luis@xxxxxxxxxxx>
To: ceph-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Sent: Tuesday, 17 December, 2013 2:56:23 PM
Subject: Re:  After reboot nothing worked

On 12/17/2013 09:54 AM, Karan Singh wrote:
> Umar
>
> *Ceph is stable for production* , there are a large number of ceph
> clusters deployed and running smoothly in PRODUCTIONS and countless in
> testing / pre-production.
>
> Since you are facing problems with your ceph testing , it does not mean
> CEPH is unstable.
>
> I would suggest put some time troubleshooting your problem.
>
> What i see from your logs  --
>
>   1) you have 2 Mons thats a problem ( either have 1  or have 3 to form
> quorum ) . Add 1 more monitor node

Just to clarify this point a bit, one doesn't need an odd number of 
monitors in a ceph cluster to reach quorum.  This is a common misconception.

The requirement to reach quorum is simply to have a majority of monitors 
able to talk to each other.  If one has 2 monitors and both are able to 
talk to each other they'll be able to form a quorum.

Odd-numbers are advised however because one can tolerate as much 
failures with less infrastructure. E.g.,

- for n = 1, failure of 1 monitor means loss of quorum
- for n = 2, failure of 1 monitor means loss of quorum
- for n = 3, failure of 1 monitor is okay; failure of 2 monitors means 
loss of quorum
- for n = 4, failure of 1 monitor is okay; failure of 2 monitors means 
loss of quorum
- for n = 5, failure of 2 monitors is okay; failure of 3 monitors means 
loss of quorum
- for n = 6, failure of 2 monitors is okay; failure of 3 monitors means 
loss of quorum

etc.

So you can see how you don't get any benefits, from an availability 
perspective, by having either 2, 4 or 6 monitors when compared to having 
1, 3, 5.  If your target however is replication, then 2 is better than 1.

   -Joao



-- 
Joao Eduardo Luis
Software Engineer | http://inktank.com | http://ceph.com
_______________________________________________
ceph-users mailing list
ceph-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com
_______________________________________________
ceph-users mailing list
ceph-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com




[Index of Archives]     [Information on CEPH]     [Linux Filesystem Development]     [Ceph Development]     [Ceph Large]     [Ceph Dev]     [Linux USB Development]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [xfs]


  Powered by Linux