Re: alternative approaches to CEPH-FS

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi Sebastien.

Thanks! WHen you say "performance was not expected", can you elaborate a little? Specifically, what did you notice in terms of performance?



On Mon, Nov 25, 2013 at 4:39 AM, Sebastien Han <sebastien.han@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Hi,
This has been in production for more than a year now and heavily tested before.
Performance was not expected since frontend server mainly do read (90%).

Cheers.
––––
Sébastien Han
Cloud Engineer

"Always give 100%. Unless you're giving blood.”

Phone: +33 (0)1 49 70 99 72
Mail: sebastien.han@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Address : 10, rue de la Victoire - 75009 Paris
Web : www.enovance.com - Twitter : @enovance

On 14 Nov 2013, at 17:08, Gautam Saxena <gsaxena@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> 1) nfs over rbd (http://www.sebastien-han.fr/blog/2012/07/06/nfs-over-rbd/)



_______________________________________________
ceph-users mailing list
ceph-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com

[Index of Archives]     [Information on CEPH]     [Linux Filesystem Development]     [Ceph Development]     [Ceph Large]     [Ceph Dev]     [Linux USB Development]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [xfs]


  Powered by Linux