Hi Dima,
Benchmark FYI.
$ /usr/sbin/bonnie++ -s 0 -n 5:1m:4k
Version 1.97 ------Sequential Create------ --------Random Create--------
altair -Create-- --Read--- -Delete-- -Create-- --Read--- -Delete--
files:max:min /sec %CP /sec %CP /sec %CP /sec %CP /sec %CP /sec %CP
5:1048576:4096 18 1 609 11 604 9 18 1 436 10 686 9
Latency 1187ms 70907us 261ms 2352ms 205ms 111ms
- WP
On Fri, Nov 15, 2013 at 11:32 PM, Dimitri Maziuk <dmaziuk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On 2013-11-15 08:26, Gautam Saxena wrote:Note that it has 2 nfs servers in ha cluster: one goes down, the other one takes over. In that sense it's more robust than just one server.
Yip,
I went to the link. Where can the script ( nfsceph) be downloaded? How's
the robustness and performance of this technique? (That is, is there are
any reason to believe that it would more/less robust and/or performant
than option #3 mentioned in the original thread?)
I'd be curious to see the numbers, like bonnie++, on the server & nfs client.
Dima
_______________________________________________
ceph-users mailing list
ceph-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com
_______________________________________________ ceph-users mailing list ceph-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com
