|
It works so cool !Thanks so much from your help!
lixuehui
On 10/30/2013 01:54 AM, Mark Kirkwood wrote:
> On 29/10/13 20:53, lixuehui wrote:
>> Hi,list
>> From the document that a radosgw-agent's right info should like this
>>
>> INFO:radosgw_agent.sync:Starting incremental sync
>> INFO:radosgw_agent.worker:17910 is processing shard number 0
>> INFO:radosgw_agent.worker:shard 0 has 0 entries after ''
>> INFO:radosgw_agent.worker:finished processing shard 0
>> INFO:radosgw_agent.worker:17910 is processing shard number 1
>> INFO:radosgw_agent.sync:1/64 shards processed
>> INFO:radosgw_agent.worker:shard 1 has 0 entries after ''
>> INFO:radosgw_agent.worker:finished processing shard 1
>> INFO:radosgw_agent.sync:2/64 shards processed
>>
>> my radosgw-agent return error like
>>
>> out = request(connection, 'get', '/admin/log',
>> dict(type=shard_type))
>> File
>> "/usr/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/radosgw_agent/client.py", line 76,
>> in request
>> return result.json()
>> AttributeError: 'Response' object has no attribute 'json'
>> ERROR:root:error doing incremental sync, trying again later
>> Traceback (most recent call last):
>> File
>> "/usr/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/radosgw_agent/cli.py", line 247, in
>> main
>> args.max_entries)
>> File
>> "/usr/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/radosgw_agent/sync.py", line 22, in
>> sync_incremental
>> num_shards = client.num_log_shards(self.src_conn,
>> self._type)
>> File
>> "/usr/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/radosgw_agent/client.py", line 142,
>> in num_log_shards
>> out = request(connection, 'get', '/admin/log',
>> dict(type=shard_type))
>> File
>> "/usr/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/radosgw_agent/client.py", line 76,
>> in request
>> Maybe there anyone ever encountered the same problem. Any help
>> is appropriated!
>>
>
> I received this error too - although I was attempting a 'full' sync at
> the time. I surmised that maybe the response object == None at that
> point? But otherwise I had no idea.
This particular error is coming from a too-old version of the
python-requests package. We weren't setting a lower bound for that library
version before, but are now. If you install with the bootstrap script
you should get a new enough version in a virtualenv, and you can run
./radosgw-agent from your git checkout.
> I was also confused about:
> - was this even supposed to work with ceph 0.71?
No, there ended up being a bug and an admin api change, so if you want
to try it early you can use the next branch. You'll need to restart the
osds and radosgw if you're upgrading. It'll be backported to dumpling
as well, but the backport hasn't been finished yet.
> - which radosgw-agent to use:
> * https://github.com/ceph/radosgw-agent
This one.
> * https://github.com/jdurgin/radosgw-agent
>
> Given that the newly updated docs:
> http://ceph.com/docs/wip-doc-radosgw/radosgw/federated-config/ suggest
> ceph 0.72, I'm wondering if we just need to be more patient?
Note that the wip in the url means it's a work-in-progress branch,
so it's not totally ready yet either. If anything is confusing or
missing, let us know.
> However - Inktank folks - there is a lot of interest in the feature, so
> forgive us if we are jumping the gun, but also the current state of play
> is murky and some clarification would not go amiss!
It's great people are interested in trying this early. It's very
helpful to find issues sooner (like the requests library version).
Thanks!
Josh
|
_______________________________________________ ceph-users mailing list ceph-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com
