Are you sure you're using only CephFS? Do you have any snapshots? -Greg Software Engineer #42 @ http://inktank.com | http://ceph.com On Fri, Oct 25, 2013 at 2:59 AM, Miguel Afonso Oliveira <m.a.oliveira@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Hi, > > I have a recent ceph deployment with version: > > ceph version 0.67.4 (ad85b8bfafea6232d64cb7ba76a8b6e8252fa0c7) > > on 4 12TB OSDs: > > GLOBAL: > SIZE AVAIL RAW USED %RAW USED > 49143G 8285G 40858G 83.14 > > POOLS: > NAME ID USED %USED OBJECTS > data 0 20396G 41.50 7342052 > metadata 1 276M 0 81826 > rbd 2 0 0 0 > > and this morning I started to get a warning about a full OSD: > > cluster 14320bfb-8b8c-4280-afee-df63172b1d0c > health HEALTH_WARN 1 near full osd(s) > monmap e3: 3 mons at > {gridio1=10.112.0.148:6789/0,gridio2=10.112.0.149:6789/0,gridio3=10.112.0.150:6789/0}, > election epoch 44, quorum 0,1,2 gridio1,gridio2,gridio3 > osdmap e498: 4 osds: 4 up, 4 in > pgmap v485463: 6144 pgs: 6142 active+clean, 2 > active+clean+scrubbing+deep; 20396 GB data, 40858 GB used, 8285 GB / 49143 > GB avail; 2252B/s wr, 0op/s > mdsmap e54: 1/1/1 up {0=gridio4=up:active} > > However when I use a du on the mount point I get: > > [root@ce01 /]# du -bsh grid/ > 31G grid/ > > This number is reasonable for the utilization of the FS... Even entering > into account with replication (2 in this case) there is no way I can > understand an underlying raw utilization > of over 40TB.... > > What is going on here? What can cause such discrepancies? I know ceph uses > delayed deletion but the discrepancy is too big... > > Cheers, > > MAO > > > > > _______________________________________________ > ceph-users mailing list > ceph-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx > http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com _______________________________________________ ceph-users mailing list ceph-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com
 |