-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA256 On 26/08/13 19:31, Sage Weil wrote: >>> I'm wondering what kind of delay, or additional "start-on" >>> logic I can add to the upstart script to work around this. > Hmm, this is beyond my upstart-fu, unfortunately. This has come up > before, actually. Previously we would wait for any interface to > come up and then start, but that broke with multi-nic machines, and > I ended up just making things start in runlevel [2345]. > > James, do you know what should be done to make the job wait for > *all* network interfaces to be up? Is that even the right solution > here? This is actually really tricky; runlevel [2345] should cover most use cases as this will ensure that interfaces configured in /etc/network/interfaces. But it sounds like that might not be the case; Travis - in your example are all network interfaces configured using /etc/network/interfaces? - -- James Page Ubuntu and Debian Developer james.page@xxxxxxxxxx jamespage@xxxxxxxxxx -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.14 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with undefined - http://www.enigmail.net/ iQIcBAEBCAAGBQJSHG6KAAoJEL/srsug59jDHJ4P/RR0HOUC8awoKlH1f92GRqqa bOo/vszIY/4c2NhCTXRX3jWxBCexlNLlwYExsbX9hzP3DDOMzOMdXh2rMM9o3zaD 98z+o1jC+hUYf27UmK+ZbZGqr4Xh9bi07g6jF2/u3OmbCcxQUaRQdzDp4dbf1MK4 Q2iigJhLBSiZw+OX0+2210+7Cmz9lKKNeuuUcsqT0jdagPYJIQlIbA9v7aNzsxlI AmEShkCBoI9lzedyFsBIZ10gtMDrvBPJHyDf3VySW/ZhLlZeAnPhRZaZ/AkcrToX 1x6quQvheWyr52bbe0gnAAoIZUpLyCG0+Xkp9+jw11HWLTdGMsn3nMI7BUZ6MHrB 8rIdBGc9gxuKsZyqP/QRBVWDWjACHckjAl0ORJdeXkfm6ZmruRTEB2CNgXZF+Wl5 h0InmcdjMTIwgxV5wgJ4d6Lom45AKaTIumpBiGvmMjuVm08V0xftkPpNbpIsbbol fmmpqTlxJtVrsd1CZd1nN74z+EOgrCDRJg4bzSPVRjkYIJc6by3udLSRFlQfz5qd 8pm7PsbSEBEY873HPZMuxAMfXQKf/EMNZTq6bbrA61sgIXUEr/YFmG9EiA8ptnAp 1cy4zRgrnL1KI9rSrjKi19wFeYEn0HRLlPqlA8likUTaGbNpXppohpt7RyE1eA6t vdMkd1v47yZuNoEsEA8e =iLfL -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- _______________________________________________ ceph-users mailing list ceph-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com