On Thu, Aug 22, 2013 at 5:18 AM, Pawel Stefanski <pejotes@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > hello! > > Today our radosgw crashed while running multiple deletions via s3 api. > > Is this known bug ? > > POST > WSTtobXBlBrm2r78B67LtQ== > > Thu, 22 Aug 2013 11:38:34 GMT > /inna-a/?delete > -11> 2013-08-22 13:39:26.650499 7f36347d8700 2 req 95:0.000555:s3:POST > /inna-a/:multi_object_delete:reading permissions > -10> 2013-08-22 13:39:26.650561 7f36347d8700 10 moving .rgw+inna-a to > cache LRU end > -9> 2013-08-22 13:39:26.650568 7f36347d8700 10 cache get: > name=.rgw+inna-a : hit > -8> 2013-08-22 13:39:26.650585 7f36347d8700 10 moving .rgw+inna-a to > cache LRU end > -7> 2013-08-22 13:39:26.650590 7f36347d8700 10 cache get: > name=.rgw+inna-a : hit > -6> 2013-08-22 13:39:26.650636 7f36347d8700 2 req 95:0.000692:s3:POST > /inna-a/:multi_object_delete:verifying op permissions > -5> 2013-08-22 13:39:26.650644 7f36347d8700 5 Searching permissions for > uid=7f0c560a-c405-422b-975c-98674543c0c1 mask=2 > -4> 2013-08-22 13:39:26.650648 7f36347d8700 5 Found permission: 15 > -3> 2013-08-22 13:39:26.650651 7f36347d8700 10 > uid=7f0c560a-c405-422b-975c-98674543c0c1 requested perm (type)=2, policy > perm=2, user_perm_mask=2, acl perm=2 > -2> 2013-08-22 13:39:26.650657 7f36347d8700 2 req 95:0.000714:s3:POST > /inna-a/:multi_object_delete:verifying op params > -1> 2013-08-22 13:39:26.650663 7f36347d8700 2 req 95:0.000720:s3:POST > /inna-a/:multi_object_delete:executing > 0> 2013-08-22 13:39:26.653482 7f36347d8700 -1 *** Caught signal > (Segmentation fault) ** > in thread 7f36347d8700 > > ceph version 0.56.6 (95a0bda7f007a33b0dc7adf4b330778fa1e5d70c) > 1: /usr/bin/radosgw() [0x4786da] > 2: (()+0xfcb0) [0x7f36843b7cb0] > 3: (std::basic_string<char, std::char_traits<char>, std::allocator<char> >>::basic_string(std::string const&)+0xb) [0x7f3683907f2b] > 4: (RGWMultiDelDelete::xml_end(char const*)+0x13a) [0x54060a] > 5: (RGWXMLParser::xml_end(char const*)+0x22) [0x4d88d2] > 6: /usr/bin/radosgw() [0x4d889a] > 7: (()+0xa6f4) [0x7f3684d426f4] > 8: (()+0xb951) [0x7f3684d43951] > 9: (()+0x87c7) [0x7f3684d407c7] > 10: (()+0xa17b) [0x7f3684d4217b] > 11: (XML_ParseBuffer()+0x6d) [0x7f3684d4575d] > 12: (RGWXMLParser::parse(char const*, int, int)+0x90) [0x4d8e70] > 13: (RGWDeleteMultiObj::execute()+0xef) [0x51640f] > 14: (RGWProcess::handle_request(RGWRequest*)+0x3e6) [0x4735f6] > 15: (RGWProcess::RGWWQ::_process(RGWRequest*)+0x36) [0x475266] > 16: (ThreadPool::worker(ThreadPool::WorkThread*)+0x4e6) [0x491b56] > 17: (ThreadPool::WorkThread::entry()+0x10) [0x493990] > 18: (()+0x7e9a) [0x7f36843afe9a] > 19: (clone()+0x6d) [0x7f3683083ccd] > NOTE: a copy of the executable, or `objdump -rdS <executable>` is needed to > interpret this. > > best regards! Yeah, that's a known issue (#5931). A fix for it was pushed not too long ago into the bobtail branch, although there wasn't a new build since. Thanks, Yehuda _______________________________________________ ceph-users mailing list ceph-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com
 |