Re: SSD recommendations for OSD journals

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 07/22/2013 01:02 PM, Oliver Fuckner wrote:
> Good evening,
> 
> 
>> I have not yet had the opportunity to try one, but something like the
>> Marvell Dragonfly might be a very interesting option for servers with
>> 24+ drives:
>>
>> https://origin-www.marvell.com/storage/dragonfly/nvram/
> 
> yes, Marvell Dragonfly also looks very promising to me, i like the
> NVDRIVE with up to 1.5T "internal" (-> on the card) Flash.
> 
> On the second look you see that they use 4 Sandisk X100 SSDs in RAID5
> and those SSDs only have 80TBytes Write Endurance each... that makes me
> nervous.

I'm less interested in the nvdrive, and more interested in the nvram.
with 8GB of RAM you could reasonably do journals for 24 OSDs and it's
backed by 32GB of flash for power failure.  Only questions are whether
or not the board itself is reliable (though hopefully it would be no
less reliable than a traditional SAS controller), and whether or not the
super capacitor can be trusted.

Of course cost could be an issue...

> 
>   Oliver
> 
> 
> sources:
> http://www.tweaktown.com/news/27686/marvell_dragonfly_nvdrive_sandisk_x100_ssd_unveiled/index.html
>   (via http://www.marvell.com/storage/dragonfly/news/)
> http://www.sandisk.com/products/ssd/sata/x100-solid-state-drive/
> 

_______________________________________________
ceph-users mailing list
ceph-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com




[Index of Archives]     [Information on CEPH]     [Linux Filesystem Development]     [Ceph Development]     [Ceph Large]     [Ceph Dev]     [Linux USB Development]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [xfs]


  Powered by Linux