FYI: i'm using ocfs2 as you plan to (/var/Lib/nova/instances/) it is stable, but Performance isnt blasting.
--
Sent from my mobile device
Hi Darryl,
Would love to do that too but only if we can configure nova to do this automatically. Any chance you could dig up and share how you guys accomplished this?
>From everything I've read so far Grizzly is not up for the task yet. If I can't set it in nova.conf then it probably won't work with 3rd party tools like Hostbill and break user self service functionality that we're aiming for with a public cloud concept. I
think we'll need
this and
this blueprint implemented to be able to achieve this, and of course
this one for the dashboard would be nice too.
I'll do some more digging into Openstack and see how far we can get with this.
In the mean time I've done some more research and figured out that:
- There is a bunch of other cluster file systems but GFS2 and OCFS2 are the only open source ones I could find, and I believe the only ones that are integrated in the Linux kernel.
- OCFS2 seems to have a lot more public information than GFS2. It has more documentation and a living - though not very active - mailing list.
- OCFS2 seems to be in active use by its sponsor Oracle, while I can't find much on GFS2 from its sponsor RedHat.
- OCFS2 documentation indicates a node soft limit of 256 versus 16 for GFS2, and there are actual deployments of stable 45 TB+ production clusters.
- Performance tests from 2010 indicate OCFS2 clearly beating GFS2, though of course newer versions have been released since.
- GFS2 has more fencing options than OCFS2.
There is not much info from the last 12 months so it's hard get an accurate picture. If we have to go with the shared storage approach OCFS2 looks like the preferred option based on the info I've gathered so far though.
Tom
Darryl Bond schreef op vr 12-07-2013 om 10:04 [+1000]:
Tom,
I'm no expert as I didn't set it up, but we are using Openstack Grizzly with KVM/QEMU and RBD volumes for VM's.
We boot the VMs from the RBD volumes and it all seems to work just fine.
Migration works perfectly, although live - no break migration only works from the command line tools. The GUI uses the pause, migrate then un-pause mode.
Layered snapshot/cloning works just fine through the GUI. I would say Grizzly has pretty good integration with CEPH.
Regards
Darryl
On 07/12/13 09:41, Tom Verdaat wrote:
Hi Alex,
We're planning to deploy OpenStack Grizzly using KVM. I agree that running every VM directly from RBD devices would be preferable, but booting from volumes is not one of OpenStack's strengths and configuring nova to make boot from volume
the default method that works automatically is not really feasible yet.
So the alternative is to mount a shared filesystem on /var/lib/nova/instances of every compute node. Hence the RBD + OCFS2/GFS2 question.
Tom
p.s. yes I've read the rbd-openstack page which covers images and persistent volumes, not running instances which is what my question is about.
2013/7/12 Alex Bligh <alex@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Tom,
On 11 Jul 2013, at 22:28, Tom Verdaat wrote:
> Actually I want my running VMs to all be stored on the same file system, so we can use live migration to move them between hosts.
>
> QEMU is not going to help because we're not using it in our virtualization solution.
Out of interest, what are you using in your virtualization solution? Most things (including modern Xen) seem to use Qemu for the back end. If your virtualization solution does not use qemu as a back end, you can use kernel rbd devices straight which
I think will give you better performance than OCFS2 on RBD devices.
A
>
> 2013/7/11 Alex Bligh <alex@xxxxxxxxxxx>
>
> On 11 Jul 2013, at 19:25, Gilles Mocellin wrote:
>
> > Hello,
> >
> > Yes, you missed that qemu can use directly RADOS volume.
> > Look here :
> > http://ceph.com/docs/master/rbd/qemu-rbd/
> >
> > Create :
> > qemu-img create -f rbd rbd:data/squeeze 10G
> >
> > Use :
> >
> > qemu -m 1024 -drive format=raw,file=rbd:data/squeeze
>
> I don't think he did. As I read it he wants his VMs to all access the same filing system, and doesn't want to use cephfs.
>
> OCFS2 on RBD I suppose is a reasonable choice for that.
>
> --
> Alex Bligh
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> ceph-users mailing list
> ceph-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com
>
--
Alex Bligh
The contents of this electronic message and any attachments are intended only for the addressee and may contain legally privileged, personal, sensitive or confidential information. If you are not the intended addressee,
and have received this email, any transmission, distribution, downloading, printing or photocopying of the contents of this message or attachments is strictly prohibited. Any legal privilege or confidentiality attached to this message and attachments is not
waived, lost or destroyed by reason of delivery to any person other than intended addressee. If you have received this message and are not the intended addressee you should notify the sender by return email and destroy all copies of the message and any attachments.
Unless expressly attributed, the views expressed in this email do not necessarily represent the views of the company.
_______________________________________________
ceph-users mailing list
ceph-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com
|
