Cannot agree more,when I trying to promote ceph to internal state holder,they always complaining the stability of ceph,especially when they are evaluating ceph with high enough pressure, ceph cannot stay heathy during the test. 发自我的 iPhone 在 2013-5-29，19:13，"Wolfgang Hennerbichler" <wolfgang.hennerbichler@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> 写道： > Hi, > > as most on the list here I also see the future of storage in ceph. I > think it is a great system and overall design, and sage with the rest of > inktank and the community are doing their best to make ceph great. Being > a part-time developer myself I know how awesome new features are, and > how great it is to implement them. > On the other hand I think cuttlefish is in a state where I am not > feeling easy when saying: ceph is stable, go ahead, use it. I do happen > to have to do a lot of presentations on ceph recently, and I'm doing a > lot of lobbying for it. > I also realize that it's not easy to develop a distributed system like > ceph, and I know it needs time and a community to test. I'm just > wondering if it might be better for the devs to keep their focus right > now on fixing nasty bugs (even more as they do already), and make the > mon's and osd's super-stable. > I have no insight on the development cycles, so chances are you're doing > this right now already. I'm just saying: I'd love to see ceph take over > the storage world, and for that we need it in super stable states. > > Then ceph can succeed big time. > > Sorry for the noise, but I really wanted to get rid of this :) > Wolfgang > _______________________________________________ > ceph-users mailing list > ceph-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx > http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com _______________________________________________ ceph-users mailing list ceph-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com
 |